Everything in this system is intended to represent strong performance for the money and the result is very pleasing.The image size is very realistic. The system is very smooth, transparent,and alive, with great bass clarity and overall dynamics.It plays to near live levels in my medium sized room. I enjoy it very much! It may be crass to call this a budget system but I just saw Albert Porters system and figured out where I am at.
Classic 3 way using 2, 5 1/4" Audax HM130Z12 high performance Areogel woofers with an 8" passive,Dayton RS52 metal dome mid replaces the original modified 37mm Polydax dome mid, and a Foster E110T samarium cobalt planar tweeter Solen Fast caps in woofer circuit Sand filled mid/tweeter cabinet VH Audio OIMP 10uf in mid circuit
Rotel RCD-1072
a great player for the cash. Mine has the black face plate.
Bel Canto Design eVo 200.2
Gleart sounding class "T" amp tweaked with new Nichicon power supply caps and some other trick parts.
Adcom GFP-750
Line stage on loan until I can complete my Pass DIY, First watt B1 buffer stage.
Grover UR 8
Killer BIG bang for the buck IC's , not in use right now because the Naim has those DIN plugs on the back of the damn thing for inputs
Custom Made Vandersteen X-2 clones
my own hand made fixed X-over filters featuring VH Audio TFTF caps, for vasty improved sound over the factory units which use generic yellow REL caps. Not being used in the rig right now due to having no sub for the time being
Furutech FS-301
14Ga OFC speaker cable replacing the stuff that comes with the 2Wq features deep cryogenic treatment and demagnetization. I dressed it up with some clear tech flex. It sounds much better than the old stuff for not a huge investment. Not being un
MIT MI 330
MI-330 used from tuner
Custom Power Cord Co. High value
on CD2
Custom Power Cord Co. model eleven
used for power amp and line stage. Both have been modded. the line filter caps have been removed to work better with the Alan Maher PE and Furutech ends have been installed.
Monster Cable HTS 1000
Budget conditioner
Bright Star Audio Air Mass 3
2, one under the CD2 and one under the SP9
Bright Star Audio Air Mass 2
Air isolation bass under VT50
Vibrapod vibration control feet
Used under TT using sandwich method with MDF base. Also under sub woofer and between 2Ce's and their stands. total of 20
VPI Brick
2, one on CD2 and one on SP9
Billy Bags Pro 30
Black with Fusion Maple shelves,isolation tips, sand filled, 197 lbs. including sand
Billy Bags 2020
Amp stand under VT 50
Oyaide Cryo'd SWO-GX
This is one hell of an AC outlet. They use extra thick (2 micron) 24K direct Gold plating over high conductivity phospher bronze. The contact surface is thoroughly (twice) polished before each plating process.This thing sounds right. I have the front end plugged into this.
Porter Port Cryo treated Hubbell 8300HI
NASA cryo treated, hospital grade duplex AC receptacles. The amp and sub are fed by this outlet.
Nitty Gritty Pro
wet vac record cleaning machine
DIY Sub Woofer Isolation Platform
DIY Bright Star Big Rock clone. Holds over 60 lbs. of sand.
DIY Power Conditioner Isolation Base
Sand filled isolation platform made to fit Monster HTS 1000
cupped bearing races with 3/8" tungsten carbide balls. Employed under CD palyer.
Furutech FI-11M (cu)
Male AC plug. One replaces the cheap molded plastic plug on the Monster conditioner.
Cable Isolators small
set of eight porcelain ceramic insulators placed under IC's speaker cables and power cables. from cableisolators.com
Alan Maher Designs AC Power Enhancer
Parallel AC noise filter
DIY Hammond 193L Choke filter design by Alan Maher
DIY AC noise filter designed by Alan Maher. This parallel filter is a huge bank for the buck! Thanks very much to Alan for the design.
DIY RFI speaker filters
used across speaker and amp connections 10 ohm resistor in parallel with 0.01uF cap filters out 21 Mgh and above radio hash that contributes to harshness, hardness, and bloated bass.
Hi Max. I still haven't pulled the trigger on the Vandy sub, but I'm still slowly saving. I noticed that you made up your own X-2 clone crossovers. I found a webpage to help figure out the cap values. Can you tell me how you made them? I can't exactly picture how it would be put together. As close as I can come is to put the cap in series with the + or signal portion of the RCA and run a bare wire on the - or ground (direct ground to ground connection). Am I close or way off?
Varakan, My VT 50 sits on a Bright Star air isolation platform with a Big Rock style sand box on top of that. Add the tube dampers to that and it really can sing! This allows the amp to reproduce very wonderful harmonic richness. Same thing with my SP9. It sits on the same arrangement with a VPI brick on top of it and HAL-0 damping instruments on the 6922's. The 9 is a case where it sounds very different with good vibration isolation that without. I really like the performance I get from the Electro Harmonix 6922 in it set up this way. Not an expensive tube at all with nice big sound stage and good extension at both ends. Good luck. I hope if you try a few of these set up tricks you like them as much as I do.
Hello guys. Thanks for looking in. Varakan I need to get a new pic up. The Vandersteens are long gone but the VT 50 is a real sweet heart and the SP 9 never really get the respect it deserves. The secret to getting the best sound from a 9 is the right vibration control. The VT responds real well to it too. Herbie's Audio Labs HAL-O dampening instruments are well worth every penny! Don't forget to use them on the output tubes too!
Ray I have not tried the rollers under the table but I am using them under my CD 2 and really like what they do there. I do have an isolation base that I just need to put the finish on that will go under the table soon.
I need to update my system listing here a bit. I have been a little distracted as of late due to some family issues. I am finding some good new tweaks though and the system is sounding real nice. One of the things I am playing around with is Oyaide AC products. I have one of their AC outlets in the system right now and it just works so well. I am using a Cryo'd SWO-GX for the front end. I would not hesitate to recommend them to everyone. I am very close to getting a second one to feed my amp and sub. I may use a Cryo'd SWO-XXX in this position. Killer stuff! Wish I could afford more of their products. The AC males are great as well as their IEC ends.
Maxgain,Have you tryed anything diff. on your Scout regarding isolation? I know you wanted to try a bearing type device,just wondering if youve had a chance yet,Ray
I just saw your system picture.. We've used black Vt-50 with Sp9 MkIII the same..I run it with ProAc 1SC..I really like the sound..I think, your use with Vandee should also sound good too
Much of it depends on the size of your room and the volume you like to listen at. I know of three people that live close by that all drive Vandersteen 2's(one pr. of 2Ci's, a pr. of 2Ce's and a pr. of 2Ce Sig's)with tube amps of this size very well. None of them have huge rooms.
You might consider trying a self powered sub in the system like I have done. This is a great way to add some power. I prefer the type of subs that use a high pass filter on the main amp. With this configuration you are truly bi-amping the system. The high pass filters out the low bass from the signal going to the main amp.This way the amp in the sub which is generaly quite large does a lot of the heavy lifting. It does take a lot of work to set it up right, but once you do it is all worth while.
Hi, I wonder if your 45Watts/channel tube amplifier strong enough to handle Vandy 2Ce. I have same speakers and tried to use Jolida 302 tube amplifier (50Watts/channel)which apparently, it's barely adequate. One of dealer told me that I have to use higher power to drive Vandy 2Ce. Thanks for your sharing. James
I think you would enjoy the sound of my Phantom's if you did like yours. Mine don't have any electrolytic caps in the crossover which makes a big improvement and the new Audax woofers are very close to state of art as far as driver tech goes. The new woofers have very little stored energy and are built like a tank. The old Polydax was ok for it's day but bears very little resembelence to these. Comparing these two woofers to each other is like comparing and old 70's Chevy Nova to a new Lexus as far as technology and build quality.
Well, I met Bill a few times back in the day and have heard MANY pairs of Phantoms, my friend Hart sold quite a few to people I know and Hart (who I did hi-end repairs for) continued to sell them until Bill stopped making them as I recall. My pair came toward the end of the run and I liked them quite a bit overall at the time despite the slight reservations I had about them.
I am glad that you are happy with your speakers. The nice thing about liking a speaker like the Kindel is that there is no "Kindel cult" to bid 'em up when they show up used. And I would love to hear them with your latest mods for myself.
There were quite a few variations of the Phantom over the years that Bill produced them. Some versions used different driver phase arrangemnts which could explain your feelings on coherence. My first pair was a late version which was very coherent as Bill refined things as time went on. The pair I own now is an early pair but I have made a number of upgrades and changes to them.
I have had several people over to hear them who have a great deal of experience with high end audio. The comments that I keep getting are comparisons to other very expensive current loudspeaker systems. Having owned quite a number of loudspeakers myself and having been in high end audio for ten years a while back, I have had the chance to get to know the sound of a number of the better speaker systems out there(B&W, Theil, Vandersteen, Quad, Magnepan, Martin Logan,Kindel Audio, Spica, to name some) including the Quad ESL57. At this point I have no interest in even thinking about changing to any other speakers and I am not even done updating them. I think that says alot.
Sorry to get back to you so late! I used ARC SP8 and D90B with the Kindels. Funny, at the time the dealer who sold Fuselier and Kindel had Vandy's but wouldn't play 'em for anyone. I finally got him to play the Vandy's (2c at the time) and felt they were more natural than the Kindels (although the top end was not up to the leaf tweeter in the Kindels). I could always hear that the drivers didn't quite cohere in the Kindel and I am (over) sensitive to that. But don't get me wrong, I like 'em and if I ever see a pair cheep might pick 'em up for old times sake. Too bad Bill K didn't stick with it, would be interesting to see what he would have come up with. Ironically, the original store owner (Hart Huschens, Audio Connection, Verona NJ) sold out to John Rutan who recognized what a fine speaker Vandersteen made, picked up the ball and has sold them like crazy! As far as Richard goes, he actually is a delightful guy IN PERSON. But he seems to not particularly like to talk on the phone, especially to people he doesn't know. He ticks some people off because he won't send out drivers etc. and let people fix their own speakers, but that's a business decision, he doesn't want defective speakers out in the field, he likes to make sure that after the repair the speakers are up to snuff. I can see both sides of that argument, I guess. I have over the years had a lot of hi-end speakers and am not wedded to Vandersteen, but was taken by the Vandy 5. But kinda big and expensive (of course not so expensive for a flagship design where other companies have 100k$ plus stuff). But the new Quattros really caught me and I bought a pair. A really great speaker, not cheap at about $7000, but at least attainable to a poor country broadcast engineer. Of my arsenal of speakers (many of which are now gone) the only one that could keep up was the old Quad 57s which probably means something. Good Luck with those Kindels!
Wonderful system, not an Albert Porter system as you mentioned but a real eye pleaser, well integrated into a spectacular room! This is the kind of system I enjoy seeing rather than something priced out of most peoples reach. Simplicity has beauty!
The single sub in this room works very well. I never have any localization problems or problems with the image due to the single sub. I do think that there are advantages to having two but for now I am very pleased with the performance. I have taken great care to make sure the woofer is set up to it's full advantage.
As far as the glass goes. It isn't much of a problem with this set up.The big plant does break up things a bit like a living room lens. I do plan to use some Marigo damping dots on the largest of the glass because the woofer does flex them a bit and I am quite sure that even greater clarity can be had. I think the glass may have been a bigger issue if I had chosen to use Maggies or another di-pole speaker in the same placement. I think glass behind the listener is a bigger problem.
I have some additional vibration control bases in the works for the TT, speakers, and the electronics. It may be some time before they get finished and installed.
I like your system and was encouraged that you get good sound in front of a window with a ten foot peaked ceiling. That is how I have mine and I have surprised at the sound field and imaging in front of glass. Thanks for the Vandy tip[. I hate lousy service and am loyal to those who extend pleasantly. gammajo
Thanks for looking in. It is sounding very nice right now. I tweaked the Phantom's with a new cap from VH Audio. Chris Venhaus sent me some of his new OIMP(oil impregnated metallized polypropylene caps to test. http://v-cap.com/oilcapacitors.html I used them in the mid range circuit of the Phantom's. These caps sound wonderful. They give the speakers a very detailed yet very natural quality. I am very pleased with the results. My hope is to get more for the tweeter circuit as soon as I can.
System edited: I have added a set of FIM 305 isolation bearings to the system. I am using a set of 3 of them between the CD2 and the Bright Star Air Mass 3. Overall they bring added focus and definition to the sound and improve the presentation of sound stage space. I have more tweaks coming soon and I have done some more work to the Phantom's x-overs with a so far top secret new cap that I will be reporting on shortly.
Ray, Thanks. The system looks abit different now with the new speakers. They are still in the restoration process. I need to post a new pic soon, even with the speakers in their unfinished state.
The plants do give the room a nice feel and they act as a bit of defusion for the bay window.
I think that a sand base like the Bright Star Big Rock would work well under your Scout in terms of bang for the buck. I am also looking very hard at roller bearing devices like the Symposium Roller Block and the Aurios. They are pretty spendy too. Not sure how well they work for a TT though. They seem a bit spooky in that aplication.
hi Maxgain,i bought a couple herbie tube dampers ,they work very well,cleared up a bit of muddiness in my lower mids,upper bass,good bang for the buck!now im trying to decide what to use to isolate my scout,also added a pr of diy acoustic panels,,really improved sound,im going to build a couple bass traps soon.you sure have a nice clean set up!the plants add a nice touch!
What did you run your Phantom's with? They love my ARC tube gear.
Over the years of the production Bill made several tweaks to the speaker that did improve them. I have incorporated those(as this pair is a much older version than the first pair I had) and several of my own along with Bill's help. They sound so good even before I have "completed" my restoration that I am not interested in any other speaker. I am not sure that I would trade them for any Vandersteen other than maybe the 5a. Maybe.I have listened to the 5a at a dealer friend of mine's place and they do sound great. I'm just not sure that they would let me enjoy the music any more that I am now. My plan was to replace the 2Ce with a pair of Maggie 1.6's but now I don't feel any desire to. In addition the Pahntom works so well with the 2Wq now that I have the right high pass filter. I think that's what the Phantom needed all along in a bigger room. The 2Wq set up is perfect as it it a true bi-amped set up and lets the 5 1/4" woofers work much better without the long excursions. They only need to have minimal output to about 40Hz(first order filter starting at about 80Hz) to blend with the sub.
Richard hates audiophiles. He's just a grumpy old fart.
Surprised you had problems with Richard, but my guess is that you wanted to work on your speakers yourself and he is pretty adimantly negative about that. I had Kindel Phantoms many years ago, a local dealer was pretty hot on them. I am surprised that only 300 were made, I have known of about 7 pairs myself, including one pair for sale at a pawn shop! They were interesting, but ultimately not that coherent to my ears, at least back then. Would be interesting to see what I think about them today. The other speaker he was keen on was the Fuselier, another obscure speaker. Ultimately, I prefered the Fuseliers but that's what makes a horserace...