Description

Speakers are Focal Grande Utopia EM in black finish

Analog music sources, Technics SP10 MK3  with two Kuzma 4 Point 14" arms.  Koetsu Blue Lace on one and Air Tight Opus One in the other.   Studer A820 half track tape machine with three sets of cards, each rebuilt by Studer electronics experts so I can compare upgrade performance.

Digital music source is Aurender W20 Special Edition into Soulution 760 LEEDH.  THe best input for music so far is Purist new USB cable and AES/EBU close second place.

Soulution 725 preamp, Soulution 755 phono stage Soulution 760 LEEDH and Soulution 701 mono block amps for electronics.  See image posted Nov 18, 2022 to see how it looks.

Cable is 100% top tier Purist Audio design.  All latest 35th Anniversary,  all ten AC cords are the new Purist 35th Anniversary AC.

My space is 18 X 31 and acoustically treated with RPG panels, tube traps and fiberglass acoustic treatment over triple reinforced walls and ceiling. The floor is lamination beams over steel plates to concrete pier and beam.  Two sheets of 5/8 epoxy lamination sheets make up the floor with two inches of concrete topped with India multi color slate.

Whisper Wall rail system and fine textured acoustic cloth covers the work, making  everything appear as a normal room of painted sheet rock or decorative cloth covering.

The room acoustics were conceived by RBDG and the entire space was torn out to bare dirt under the foundation and bare studs in the walls.  The combo of all new electrical and acoustical treatment resulting in best sound I’ve ever had.
Read more...

Room Details

Dimensions: 31’ × 18’  X large
Ceiling: 12’


Components Toggle details

    • My Photography http://www.albertporterphoto.com
    Commercial + Advertising Photography, Dallas, TX.
    • Focal Grande Utopia EM
    The best offering from Focal, shown with Stillpoints Ultra 5. Ultra 5 was an amazing upgrade for the speakers !
    • RPG Acoustics QRD 734 (variation)
    On front wall, now obscured by acoustically transparent cloth, is floor to ceiling RPG (similar to QRD® 734) in foam, so it's partially absorptive.
    • Studer Studer A820
    Found a near mint A820 at a production studio in Illinois.  I was so excited about it's condition I had it driven here in the back of an SUV, covered with moving blankets.

    Head block sent to John French and all cards at Soren Wittrup who worked for Studer.  This is the machine I spent more than a decade searching for.
    • Technics SP10 MK3 Rosewood with Stillpoints Ultra 5
    Technics SP10 MK3 Panzerholz + Rosewood shown with Stillpoints Ultra 5
    • Technics SP10 MK3 Panzerholz + Ebony
    Technics SP10 MK3 Panzerholz with African Ebony lumber (no Veneer). This is the original design by John Semrad and myself, copied to death now.
    • TTM Stainless Mat and Oil Damp Weight
    Japan, TTM Stainless mat (6.61 pounds) plus TTM oil filled record weight.
    • TTM record stabilizer TTM three piece set
    Very hard to find, grateful I was able to purchase this last week.  Three piece TTM record stabilizer replaces my previous single piece unit.
    • Air Tight Opus
    Air Tight top of the line phono cartridge
    • Mutech Hayabusa
    Excellent MC cartridge, retail about $4500.00
    • Koetsu Blue Lace Platinum
    Top tier stone body Koetsu, perfect alternate to Air Tight Opus One
    • Soulution 725 preamp
    725, Soulution best preamp, shown in system
    • Soulution 755 phono
    Soulution best phono stage, unbelievable amount of adjustment for cartridge including channel balance to 1 DB
    • Soulution Soulution 760 LEEDH
    Soulution top tier DAC, really pleased with performance of this DAC.  

    I still prefer analog but many recordings that were digital to begin with (and vinyl cut from CD master) are better on Soulution than on turntable.
    • Soulution 701 Mono Block Amplifiers
    Soulution top tier 2KW solid state amps from Switzerland
    • ORB-DF03 USA version DF03
    Excellent LP flattener, simple to use and so far perfect result
    • Aurender W20 Special Edition
    Aurender music server, model W20 SE with 16TB solid state storage on board.
    • Vibraplane 2212-01
    Under my Technics MK3,  powered by Silentaire DR-150
    • Degritter MK2 Ultrasonic LP cleaning machine
    From Estonia, very powerful ultrasonic LP cleaning machine.  The MK2 version is better than the original which was already the best I’ve heard
    • Degritter and ORB LP flattner Degritter and ORB LP flattner
    View of two important pieces to maintain LP collection
    • Milbank Transocket three phase 750 amp
    750 amp meter base. Pass through design, three phase power is a huge benefit in conjunction with our dedicated transformer.
    • Porter Port Cryo outlets 20 Amp
    14 of these in my system, each to a dedicated breaker in copper based electrical box
    • Furutech NCF Booster
    New NCF Booster added to majority of AC cords in system.  Easy to see against light colored wall, arrow points to NCF Booster to my (previous) owned Allnic M-5000 amp.
    • Purist Audio Design Focal EM Supply cable
    New four conductor cord, replaces stock Focal supply cord from EM drive box to back of speaker. Amazing upgrade
    • Purist Audio Design 35th Anniversary XLR (4 total)
    (1) Soulution 755 phono to Soulution 725 preamp
    (1) Soulution 725 preamp to Soulution 701 mono blocks
    (1) Soulution 760 LEEDH DAC to Soulution 725 preamp
    (1) Studer A820 to Soulution 725 preamp
    • Purist Audio Design 35th Anniversary Bi-Wire
    1.5 meter Bi-Wire, Soulution 701 mono blocks to Focal Grande EM
    • Purist Audio Design 35th Anniversary AC Cables
    New STUNNING cable from Purist Audio, silver and seven stage network box.  This cable brought so much dynamics, resolution and transparency to my system it qualifies as a main component.
    • Leica Disto D2
    Super laser measuring tool. Indispensable for setting distance and alignment of your speakers

Comments 4740

Albert...understood completely.. We have Charter here delivering 60MB on download which surprisingly measures higher than that using speedtest.net repeatedly even during peak periods. The one thing I ran into with the Samsung UHD4K panel 3 months into owning it was a quirky WiFi receiver module that had to be replaced as it was one of the first units to hit the market and i purchased it as soon as it came out; once I did that, I had hiccup-free Netflix, VUDU, etc....coming in at UHD and HD according to its source.

Similarly good results for Oppo 105D (own one as well) for Netflix and other apps which has proven stable and reliable on the Charter link. The only caveat on reaping all that was coming in viz. bandwidth from Charter was that with a WiFi router, there are very few that truly pass on all the bandwidth from the Cable or DSL model they are tethered to...9 of 10 prior routers I've owned (Netgear, Linksys, etc..) were dependable but even for the prior 802.11 a/b/g/n capable ones, they would wind up limiting what devices connected could actually achieve in terms of speedtest/other measurements for sustained as well as burst mode receives. The Netgear X6 I wrote about above is the first that lets me have the full bandwidth of the incoming cable line actually passed on to any WiFi-connected device. Expect the X7 router from Netgear capable of the same.

As far as DSL services, I have avoided them, as a matter of preference and capability. Here's two interesting links on DSL types;

http://computer.howstuffworks.com/vdsl3.htm

http://electronicdesign.com/communications/what-s-difference-between-cable-and-dsl-broadband-access

Have a great weekend and happy listening!

zephyr24069

Owner
Swampwalker
.....can recommend an advanced amateur digital SLR? We've got some decent point and shoot for snapshots but my wife would like to get back to doing some more "artistic" photography when she retires next year.

We've both used film SLRs in the past (Canon Rebel) but neither of us has done much more than snapshooting w digital cameras. The plethora of unnecessary features and impenetrable nested menus real make them difficult to use...

Hello Swamp,

I agree that many cameras today have menus buried inside menus. I’ve made my living as a commercial photographer for decades and some of those “simple” point and shoot cameras make my head spin.

Maybe because I began with manual camera and a hand held meter but whatever the reason the choices that include blinking lights, images of mountain ranges and soccer players are not helpful.

I don’t want to steer you away from Canon if you’re comfortable with the brand. They are an excellent company but I’m mostly familiar with Nikon and Sony (excluding large pro cameras).

If you want SLR the Nikon D800 or D810 (about 36 MP) are more resolution than most people can use. It would supply quality images to meet any use you might have including very large prints and plenty of image quality to do drastic crops and still have sharpness to spare.

Nikon

If you want smaller, more economical and simpler than an SLR the Sony A6000 (24 MP) has very good resolution, is super lightweight and is fun to use. It produces amazing images and although not the ultimate resolution of the Nikon it’s what I use when I go out to capture images for fun. The Sony sensor shares color personality with Nikon and for good reason. They supply the 36 MP sensor for Nikon.

Sony

Sony offers custom Zeiss zoom lenses in their mount system. Zeiss glass is expensive but color is excellent, same company that made glass for Hasselblad (moon camera).

Safe place to buy either is B&H in New York if you don’t have someone local. They are incredibly honest, not like some mail order houses that promise and don’t deliver.

Feel free to email me if you need help or I’m glad to spend phone time. Hope whatever you choose you and your wife enjoy the creative time together.

albertporter

Owner
Swampwalker
.....can recommend an advanced amateur digital SLR? We've got some decent point and shoot for snapshots but my wife would like to get back to doing some more "artistic" photography when she retires next year.

We've both used film SLRs in the past (Canon Rebel) but neither of us has done much more than snapshooting w digital cameras. The plethora of unnecessary features and impenetrable nested menus real make them difficult to use...

Hello Swamp,

I agree that many cameras today have menus buried inside menus. I’ve made my living as a commercial photographer for decades and some of those “simple” point and shoot cameras make my head spin.

Maybe because I began with manual camera and a hand held meter but whatever the reason the choices that include blinking lights, images of mountain ranges and soccer players are not helpful.

I don’t want to steer you away from Canon if you’re comfortable with the brand. They are an excellent company but I’m mostly familiar with Nikon and Sony (excluding large pro cameras).

If you want SLR the Nikon D800 or D810 (about 36 MP) are more resolution than most people can use. It would supply quality images to meet any use you might have including very large prints and plenty of image quality to do drastic crops and still have sharpness to spare.

Nikon

If you want smaller, more economical and simpler than an SLR the Sony A6000 (24 MP) has very good resolution, is super lightweight and is fun to use. It produces amazing images and although not the ultimate resolution of the Nikon it’s what I use when I go out to capture images for fun. The Sony sensor shares color personality with Nikon and for good reason. They supply the 36 MP sensor for Nikon.

Sony

Sony offers custom Zeiss zoom lenses in their mount system. Zeiss glass is expensive but color is excellent, same company that made glass for Hasselblad (moon camera).

Safe place to buy either is B&H in New York if you don’t have someone local. They are incredibly honest, not like some mail order houses that promise and don’t deliver.

Feel free to email me if you need help or I’m glad to spend phone time. Hope whatever you choose you and your wife enjoy the creative time together.

albertporter

Owner
Swampwalker
.....can recommend an advanced amateur digital SLR? We've got some decent point and shoot for snapshots but my wife would like to get back to doing some more "artistic" photography when she retires next year.

We've both used film SLRs in the past (Canon Rebel) but neither of us has done much more than snapshooting w digital cameras. The plethora of unnecessary features and impenetrable nested menus real make them difficult to use...

Hello Swamp,

I agree that many cameras today have menus buried inside menus. I’ve made my living as a commercial photographer for decades and some of those “simple” point and shoot cameras make my head spin.

Maybe because I began with manual camera and a hand held meter but whatever the reason the choices that include blinking lights, images of mountain ranges and soccer players are not helpful.

I don’t want to steer you away from Canon if you’re comfortable with the brand. They are an excellent company but I’m mostly familiar with Nikon and Sony (excluding large pro cameras).

If you want SLR the Nikon D800 or D810 (about 36 MP) are more resolution than most people can use. It would supply quality images to meet any use you might have including very large prints and plenty of image quality to do drastic crops and still have sharpness to spare.

Nikon

If you want smaller, more economical and simpler than an SLR the Sony A6000 (24 MP) has very good resolution, is super lightweight and is fun to use. It produces amazing images and although not the ultimate resolution of the Nikon it’s what I use when I go out to capture images for fun. The Sony sensor shares color personality with Nikon and for good reason. They supply the 36 MP sensor for Nikon.

Sony

Sony offers custom Zeiss zoom lenses in their mount system. Zeiss glass is expensive but color is excellent, same company that made glass for Hasselblad (moon camera).

Safe place to buy either is B&H in New York if you don’t have someone local. They are incredibly honest, not like some mail order houses that promise and don’t deliver.

Feel free to email me if you need help or I’m glad to spend phone time. Hope whatever you choose you and your wife enjoy the creative time together.

albertporter

Owner
Swampwalker
.....can recommend an advanced amateur digital SLR? We've got some decent point and shoot for snapshots but my wife would like to get back to doing some more "artistic" photography when she retires next year.

We've both used film SLRs in the past (Canon Rebel) but neither of us has done much more than snapshooting w digital cameras. The plethora of unnecessary features and impenetrable nested menus real make them difficult to use...

Hello Swamp,

I agree that many cameras today have menus buried inside menus. I’ve made my living as a commercial photographer for decades and some of those “simple” point and shoot cameras make my head spin.

Maybe because I began with manual camera and a hand held meter but whatever the reason the choices that include blinking lights, images of mountain ranges and soccer players are not helpful.

I don’t want to steer you away from Canon if you’re comfortable with the brand. They are an excellent company but I’m mostly familiar with Nikon and Sony (excluding large pro cameras).

If you want SLR the Nikon D800 or D810 (about 36 MP) are more resolution than most people can use. It would supply quality images to meet any use you might have including very large prints and plenty of image quality to do drastic crops and still have sharpness to spare.

Nikon

If you want smaller, more economical and simpler than an SLR the Sony A6000 (24 MP) has very good resolution, is super lightweight and is fun to use. It produces amazing images and although not the ultimate resolution of the Nikon it’s what I use when I go out to capture images for fun. The Sony sensor shares color personality with Nikon and for good reason. They supply the 36 MP sensor for Nikon.

Sony

Sony offers custom Zeiss zoom lenses in their mount system. Zeiss glass is expensive but color is excellent, same company that made glass for Hasselblad (moon camera).

Safe place to buy either is B&H in New York if you don’t have someone local. They are incredibly honest, not like some mail order houses that promise and don’t deliver.

Feel free to email me if you need help or I’m glad to spend phone time. Hope whatever you choose you and your wife enjoy the creative time together.

albertporter

Owner
Swampwalker
.....can recommend an advanced amateur digital SLR? We've got some decent point and shoot for snapshots but my wife would like to get back to doing some more "artistic" photography when she retires next year.

We've both used film SLRs in the past (Canon Rebel) but neither of us has done much more than snapshooting w digital cameras. The plethora of unnecessary features and impenetrable nested menus real make them difficult to use...

Hello Swamp,

I agree that many cameras today have menus buried inside menus. I’ve made my living as a commercial photographer for decades and some of those “simple” point and shoot cameras make my head spin.

Maybe because I began with manual camera and a hand held meter but whatever the reason the choices that include blinking lights, images of mountain ranges and soccer players are not helpful.

I don’t want to steer you away from Canon if you’re comfortable with the brand. They are an excellent company but I’m mostly familiar with Nikon and Sony (excluding large pro cameras).

If you want SLR the Nikon D800 or D810 (about 36 MP) are more resolution than most people can use. It would supply quality images to meet any use you might have including very large prints and plenty of image quality to do drastic crops and still have sharpness to spare.

Nikon

If you want smaller, more economical and simpler than an SLR the Sony A6000 (24 MP) has very good resolution, is super lightweight and is fun to use. It produces amazing images and although not the ultimate resolution of the Nikon it’s what I use when I go out to capture images for fun. The Sony sensor shares color personality with Nikon and for good reason. They supply the 36 MP sensor for Nikon.

Sony

Sony offers custom Zeiss zoom lenses in their mount system. Zeiss glass is expensive but color is excellent, same company that made glass for Hasselblad (moon camera).

Safe place to buy either is B&H in New York if you don’t have someone local. They are incredibly honest, not like some mail order houses that promise and don’t deliver.

Feel free to email me if you need help or I’m glad to spend phone time. Hope whatever you choose you and your wife enjoy the creative time together.

albertporter

Owner
Swampwalker
.....can recommend an advanced amateur digital SLR? We've got some decent point and shoot for snapshots but my wife would like to get back to doing some more "artistic" photography when she retires next year.

We've both used film SLRs in the past (Canon Rebel) but neither of us has done much more than snapshooting w digital cameras. The plethora of unnecessary features and impenetrable nested menus real make them difficult to use...

Hello Swamp,

I agree that many cameras today have menus buried inside menus. I’ve made my living as a commercial photographer for decades and some of those “simple” point and shoot cameras make my head spin.

Maybe because I began with manual camera and a hand held meter but whatever the reason the choices that include blinking lights, images of mountain ranges and soccer players are not helpful.

I don’t want to steer you away from Canon if you’re comfortable with the brand. They are an excellent company but I’m mostly familiar with Nikon and Sony (excluding large pro cameras).

If you want SLR the Nikon D800 or D810 (about 36 MP) are more resolution than most people can use. It would supply quality images to meet any use you might have including very large prints and plenty of image quality to do drastic crops and still have sharpness to spare.

Nikon

If you want smaller, more economical and simpler than an SLR the Sony A6000 (24 MP) has very good resolution, is super lightweight and is fun to use. It produces amazing images and although not the ultimate resolution of the Nikon it’s what I use when I go out to capture images for fun. The Sony sensor shares color personality with Nikon and for good reason. They supply the 36 MP sensor for Nikon.

Sony

Sony offers custom Zeiss zoom lenses in their mount system. Zeiss glass is expensive but color is excellent, same company that made glass for Hasselblad (moon camera).

Safe place to buy either is B&H in New York if you don’t have someone local. They are incredibly honest, not like some mail order houses that promise and don’t deliver.

Feel free to email me if you need help or I’m glad to spend phone time. Hope whatever you choose you and your wife enjoy the creative time together.

albertporter

Owner
Swampwalker
.....can recommend an advanced amateur digital SLR? We've got some decent point and shoot for snapshots but my wife would like to get back to doing some more "artistic" photography when she retires next year.

We've both used film SLRs in the past (Canon Rebel) but neither of us has done much more than snapshooting w digital cameras. The plethora of unnecessary features and impenetrable nested menus real make them difficult to use...

Hello Swamp,

I agree that many cameras today have menus buried inside menus. I’ve made my living as a commercial photographer for decades and some of those “simple” point and shoot cameras make my head spin.

Maybe because I began with manual camera and a hand held meter but whatever the reason the choices that include blinking lights, images of mountain ranges and soccer players are not helpful.

I don’t want to steer you away from Canon if you’re comfortable with the brand. They are an excellent company but I’m mostly familiar with Nikon and Sony (excluding large pro cameras).

If you want SLR the Nikon D800 or D810 (about 36 MP) are more resolution than most people can use. It would supply quality images to meet any use you might have including very large prints and plenty of image quality to do drastic crops and still have sharpness to spare.

Nikon

If you want smaller, more economical and simpler than an SLR the Sony A6000 (24 MP) has very good resolution, is super lightweight and is fun to use. It produces amazing images and although not the ultimate resolution of the Nikon it’s what I use when I go out to capture images for fun. The Sony sensor shares color personality with Nikon and for good reason. They supply the 36 MP sensor for Nikon.

Sony

Sony offers custom Zeiss zoom lenses in their mount system. Zeiss glass is expensive but color is excellent, same company that made glass for Hasselblad (moon camera).

Safe place to buy either is B&H in New York if you don’t have someone local. They are incredibly honest, not like some mail order houses that promise and don’t deliver.

Feel free to email me if you need help or I’m glad to spend phone time. Hope whatever you choose you and your wife enjoy the creative time together.

albertporter

Owner
Swampwalker
.....can recommend an advanced amateur digital SLR? We've got some decent point and shoot for snapshots but my wife would like to get back to doing some more "artistic" photography when she retires next year.

We've both used film SLRs in the past (Canon Rebel) but neither of us has done much more than snapshooting w digital cameras. The plethora of unnecessary features and impenetrable nested menus real make them difficult to use...

Hello Swamp,

I agree that many cameras today have menus buried inside menus. I’ve made my living as a commercial photographer for decades and some of those “simple” point and shoot cameras make my head spin.

Maybe because I began with manual camera and a hand held meter but whatever the reason the choices that include blinking lights, images of mountain ranges and soccer players are not helpful.

I don’t want to steer you away from Canon if you’re comfortable with the brand. They are an excellent company but I’m mostly familiar with Nikon and Sony (excluding large pro cameras).

If you want SLR the Nikon D800 or D810 (about 36 MP) are more resolution than most people can use. It would supply quality images to meet any use you might have including very large prints and plenty of image quality to do drastic crops and still have sharpness to spare.

Nikon

If you want smaller, more economical and simpler than an SLR the Sony A6000 (24 MP) has very good resolution, is super lightweight and is fun to use. It produces amazing images and although not the ultimate resolution of the Nikon it’s what I use when I go out to capture images for fun. The Sony sensor shares color personality with Nikon and for good reason. They supply the 36 MP sensor for Nikon.

Sony

Sony offers custom Zeiss zoom lenses in their mount system. Zeiss glass is expensive but color is excellent, same company that made glass for Hasselblad (moon camera).

Safe place to buy either is B&H in New York if you don’t have someone local. They are incredibly honest, not like some mail order houses that promise and don’t deliver.

Feel free to email me if you need help or I’m glad to spend phone time. Hope whatever you choose you and your wife enjoy the creative time together.

albertporter

Owner
Swampwalker
.....can recommend an advanced amateur digital SLR? We've got some decent point and shoot for snapshots but my wife would like to get back to doing some more "artistic" photography when she retires next year.

We've both used film SLRs in the past (Canon Rebel) but neither of us has done much more than snapshooting w digital cameras. The plethora of unnecessary features and impenetrable nested menus real make them difficult to use...

Hello Swamp,

I agree that many cameras today have menus buried inside menus. I’ve made my living as a commercial photographer for decades and some of those “simple” point and shoot cameras make my head spin.

Maybe because I began with manual camera and a hand held meter but whatever the reason the choices that include blinking lights, images of mountain ranges and soccer players are not helpful.

I don’t want to steer you away from Canon if you’re comfortable with the brand. They are an excellent company but I’m mostly familiar with Nikon and Sony (excluding large pro cameras).

If you want SLR the Nikon D800 or D810 (about 36 MP) are more resolution than most people can use. It would supply quality images to meet any use you might have including very large prints and plenty of image quality to do drastic crops and still have sharpness to spare.

Nikon

If you want smaller, more economical and simpler than an SLR the Sony A6000 (24 MP) has very good resolution, is super lightweight and is fun to use. It produces amazing images and although not the ultimate resolution of the Nikon it’s what I use when I go out to capture images for fun. The Sony sensor shares color personality with Nikon and for good reason. They supply the 36 MP sensor for Nikon.

Sony

Sony offers custom Zeiss zoom lenses in their mount system. Zeiss glass is expensive but color is excellent, same company that made glass for Hasselblad (moon camera).

Safe place to buy either is B&H in New York if you don’t have someone local. They are incredibly honest, not like some mail order houses that promise and don’t deliver.

Feel free to email me if you need help or I’m glad to spend phone time. Hope whatever you choose you and your wife enjoy the creative time together.

albertporter

Owner
Swampwalker
.....can recommend an advanced amateur digital SLR? We've got some decent point and shoot for snapshots but my wife would like to get back to doing some more "artistic" photography when she retires next year.

We've both used film SLRs in the past (Canon Rebel) but neither of us has done much more than snapshooting w digital cameras. The plethora of unnecessary features and impenetrable nested menus real make them difficult to use...

Hello Swamp,

I agree that many cameras today have menus buried inside menus. I’ve made my living as a commercial photographer for decades and some of those “simple” point and shoot cameras make my head spin.

Maybe because I began with manual camera and a hand held meter but whatever the reason the choices that include blinking lights, images of mountain ranges and soccer players are not helpful.

I don’t want to steer you away from Canon if you’re comfortable with the brand. They are an excellent company but I’m mostly familiar with Nikon and Sony (excluding large pro cameras).

If you want SLR the Nikon D800 or D810 (about 36 MP) are more resolution than most people can use. It would supply quality images to meet any use you might have including very large prints and plenty of image quality to do drastic crops and still have sharpness to spare.

Nikon

If you want smaller, more economical and simpler than an SLR the Sony A6000 (24 MP) has very good resolution, is super lightweight and is fun to use. It produces amazing images and although not the ultimate resolution of the Nikon it’s what I use when I go out to capture images for fun. The Sony sensor shares color personality with Nikon and for good reason. They supply the 36 MP sensor for Nikon.

Sony

Sony offers custom Zeiss zoom lenses in their mount system. Zeiss glass is expensive but color is excellent, same company that made glass for Hasselblad (moon camera).

Safe place to buy either is B&H in New York if you don’t have someone local. They are incredibly honest, not like some mail order houses that promise and don’t deliver.

Feel free to email me if you need help or I’m glad to spend phone time. Hope whatever you choose you and your wife enjoy the creative time together.

albertporter

Owner
Swampwalker
.....can recommend an advanced amateur digital SLR? We've got some decent point and shoot for snapshots but my wife would like to get back to doing some more "artistic" photography when she retires next year.

We've both used film SLRs in the past (Canon Rebel) but neither of us has done much more than snapshooting w digital cameras. The plethora of unnecessary features and impenetrable nested menus real make them difficult to use...

Hello Swamp,

I agree that many cameras today have menus buried inside menus. I’ve made my living as a commercial photographer for decades and some of those “simple” point and shoot cameras make my head spin.

Maybe because I began with manual camera and a hand held meter but whatever the reason the choices that include blinking lights, images of mountain ranges and soccer players are not helpful.

I don’t want to steer you away from Canon if you’re comfortable with the brand. They are an excellent company but I’m mostly familiar with Nikon and Sony (excluding large pro cameras).

If you want SLR the Nikon D800 or D810 (about 36 MP) are more resolution than most people can use. It would supply quality images to meet any use you might have including very large prints and plenty of image quality to do drastic crops and still have sharpness to spare.

Nikon

If you want smaller, more economical and simpler than an SLR the Sony A6000 (24 MP) has very good resolution, is super lightweight and is fun to use. It produces amazing images and although not the ultimate resolution of the Nikon it’s what I use when I go out to capture images for fun. The Sony sensor shares color personality with Nikon and for good reason. They supply the 36 MP sensor for Nikon.

Sony

Sony offers custom Zeiss zoom lenses in their mount system. Zeiss glass is expensive but color is excellent, same company that made glass for Hasselblad (moon camera).

Safe place to buy either is B&H in New York if you don’t have someone local. They are incredibly honest, not like some mail order houses that promise and don’t deliver.

Feel free to email me if you need help or I’m glad to spend phone time. Hope whatever you choose you and your wife enjoy the creative time together.

albertporter

Owner
Swampwalker
.....can recommend an advanced amateur digital SLR? We've got some decent point and shoot for snapshots but my wife would like to get back to doing some more "artistic" photography when she retires next year.

We've both used film SLRs in the past (Canon Rebel) but neither of us has done much more than snapshooting w digital cameras. The plethora of unnecessary features and impenetrable nested menus real make them difficult to use...

Hello Swamp,

I agree that many cameras today have menus buried inside menus. I’ve made my living as a commercial photographer for decades and some of those “simple” point and shoot cameras make my head spin.

Maybe because I began with manual camera and a hand held meter but whatever the reason the choices that include blinking lights, images of mountain ranges and soccer players are not helpful.

I don’t want to steer you away from Canon if you’re comfortable with the brand. They are an excellent company but I’m mostly familiar with Nikon and Sony (excluding large pro cameras).

If you want SLR the Nikon D800 or D810 (about 36 MP) are more resolution than most people can use. It would supply quality images to meet any use you might have including very large prints and plenty of image quality to do drastic crops and still have sharpness to spare.

Nikon

If you want smaller, more economical and simpler than an SLR the Sony A6000 (24 MP) has very good resolution, is super lightweight and is fun to use. It produces amazing images and although not the ultimate resolution of the Nikon it’s what I use when I go out to capture images for fun. The Sony sensor shares color personality with Nikon and for good reason. They supply the 36 MP sensor for Nikon.

Sony

Sony offers custom Zeiss zoom lenses in their mount system. Zeiss glass is expensive but color is excellent, same company that made glass for Hasselblad (moon camera).

Safe place to buy either is B&H in New York if you don’t have someone local. They are incredibly honest, not like some mail order houses that promise and don’t deliver.

Feel free to email me if you need help or I’m glad to spend phone time. Hope whatever you choose you and your wife enjoy the creative time together.

albertporter

Owner
Swampwalker
.....can recommend an advanced amateur digital SLR? We've got some decent point and shoot for snapshots but my wife would like to get back to doing some more "artistic" photography when she retires next year.

We've both used film SLRs in the past (Canon Rebel) but neither of us has done much more than snapshooting w digital cameras. The plethora of unnecessary features and impenetrable nested menus real make them difficult to use...

Hello Swamp,

I agree that many cameras today have menus buried inside menus. I’ve made my living as a commercial photographer for decades and some of those “simple” point and shoot cameras make my head spin.

Maybe because I began with manual camera and a hand held meter but whatever the reason the choices that include blinking lights, images of mountain ranges and soccer players are not helpful.

I don’t want to steer you away from Canon if you’re comfortable with the brand. They are an excellent company but I’m mostly familiar with Nikon and Sony (excluding large pro cameras).

If you want SLR the Nikon D800 or D810 (about 36 MP) are more resolution than most people can use. It would supply quality images to meet any use you might have including very large prints and plenty of image quality to do drastic crops and still have sharpness to spare.

Nikon

If you want smaller, more economical and simpler than an SLR the Sony A6000 (24 MP) has very good resolution, is super lightweight and is fun to use. It produces amazing images and although not the ultimate resolution of the Nikon it’s what I use when I go out to capture images for fun. The Sony sensor shares color personality with Nikon and for good reason. They supply the 36 MP sensor for Nikon.

Sony

Sony offers custom Zeiss zoom lenses in their mount system. Zeiss glass is expensive but color is excellent, same company that made glass for Hasselblad (moon camera).

Safe place to buy either is B&H in New York if you don’t have someone local. They are incredibly honest, not like some mail order houses that promise and don’t deliver.

Feel free to email me if you need help or I’m glad to spend phone time. Hope whatever you choose you and your wife enjoy the creative time together.

albertporter

Owner
Swampwalker
.....can recommend an advanced amateur digital SLR? We've got some decent point and shoot for snapshots but my wife would like to get back to doing some more "artistic" photography when she retires next year.

We've both used film SLRs in the past (Canon Rebel) but neither of us has done much more than snapshooting w digital cameras. The plethora of unnecessary features and impenetrable nested menus real make them difficult to use...

Hello Swamp,

I agree that many cameras today have menus buried inside menus. I’ve made my living as a commercial photographer for decades and some of those “simple” point and shoot cameras make my head spin.

Maybe because I began with manual camera and a hand held meter but whatever the reason the choices that include blinking lights, images of mountain ranges and soccer players are not helpful.

I don’t want to steer you away from Canon if you’re comfortable with the brand. They are an excellent company but I’m mostly familiar with Nikon and Sony (excluding large pro cameras).

If you want SLR the Nikon D800 or D810 (about 36 MP) are more resolution than most people can use. It would supply quality images to meet any use you might have including very large prints and plenty of image quality to do drastic crops and still have sharpness to spare.

Nikon

If you want smaller, more economical and simpler than an SLR the Sony A6000 (24 MP) has very good resolution, is super lightweight and is fun to use. It produces amazing images and although not the ultimate resolution of the Nikon it’s what I use when I go out to capture images for fun. The Sony sensor shares color personality with Nikon and for good reason. They supply the 36 MP sensor for Nikon.

Sony

Sony offers custom Zeiss zoom lenses in their mount system. Zeiss glass is expensive but color is excellent, same company that made glass for Hasselblad (moon camera).

Safe place to buy either is B&H in New York if you don’t have someone local. They are incredibly honest, not like some mail order houses that promise and don’t deliver.

Feel free to email me if you need help or I’m glad to spend phone time. Hope whatever you choose you and your wife enjoy the creative time together.

albertporter

Owner
Swampwalker
.....can recommend an advanced amateur digital SLR? We've got some decent point and shoot for snapshots but my wife would like to get back to doing some more "artistic" photography when she retires next year.

We've both used film SLRs in the past (Canon Rebel) but neither of us has done much more than snapshooting w digital cameras. The plethora of unnecessary features and impenetrable nested menus real make them difficult to use...

Hello Swamp,

I agree that many cameras today have menus buried inside menus. I’ve made my living as a commercial photographer for decades and some of those “simple” point and shoot cameras make my head spin.

Maybe because I began with manual camera and a hand held meter but whatever the reason the choices that include blinking lights, images of mountain ranges and soccer players are not helpful.

I don’t want to steer you away from Canon if you’re comfortable with the brand. They are an excellent company but I’m mostly familiar with Nikon and Sony (excluding large pro cameras).

If you want SLR the Nikon D800 or D810 (about 36 MP) are more resolution than most people can use. It would supply quality images to meet any use you might have including very large prints and plenty of image quality to do drastic crops and still have sharpness to spare.

Nikon

If you want smaller, more economical and simpler than an SLR the Sony A6000 (24 MP) has very good resolution, is super lightweight and is fun to use. It produces amazing images and although not the ultimate resolution of the Nikon it’s what I use when I go out to capture images for fun. The Sony sensor shares color personality with Nikon and for good reason. They supply the 36 MP sensor for Nikon.

Sony

Sony offers custom Zeiss zoom lenses in their mount system. Zeiss glass is expensive but color is excellent, same company that made glass for Hasselblad (moon camera).

Safe place to buy either is B&H in New York if you don’t have someone local. They are incredibly honest, not like some mail order houses that promise and don’t deliver.

Feel free to email me if you need help or I’m glad to spend phone time. Hope whatever you choose you and your wife enjoy the creative time together.

albertporter

Owner
Swampwalker
.....can recommend an advanced amateur digital SLR? We've got some decent point and shoot for snapshots but my wife would like to get back to doing some more "artistic" photography when she retires next year.

We've both used film SLRs in the past (Canon Rebel) but neither of us has done much more than snapshooting w digital cameras. The plethora of unnecessary features and impenetrable nested menus real make them difficult to use...

Hello Swamp,

I agree that many cameras today have menus buried inside menus. I’ve made my living as a commercial photographer for decades and some of those “simple” point and shoot cameras make my head spin.

Maybe because I began with manual camera and a hand held meter but whatever the reason the choices that include blinking lights, images of mountain ranges and soccer players are not helpful.

I don’t want to steer you away from Canon if you’re comfortable with the brand. They are an excellent company but I’m mostly familiar with Nikon and Sony (excluding large pro cameras).

If you want SLR the Nikon D800 or D810 (about 36 MP) are more resolution than most people can use. It would supply quality images to meet any use you might have including very large prints and plenty of image quality to do drastic crops and still have sharpness to spare.

Nikon

If you want smaller, more economical and simpler than an SLR the Sony A6000 (24 MP) has very good resolution, is super lightweight and is fun to use. It produces amazing images and although not the ultimate resolution of the Nikon it’s what I use when I go out to capture images for fun. The Sony sensor shares color personality with Nikon and for good reason. They supply the 36 MP sensor for Nikon.

Sony

Sony offers custom Zeiss zoom lenses in their mount system. Zeiss glass is expensive but color is excellent, same company that made glass for Hasselblad (moon camera).

Safe place to buy either is B&H in New York if you don’t have someone local. They are incredibly honest, not like some mail order houses that promise and don’t deliver.

Feel free to email me if you need help or I’m glad to spend phone time. Hope whatever you choose you and your wife enjoy the creative time together.

albertporter

Owner
Swampwalker
.....can recommend an advanced amateur digital SLR? We've got some decent point and shoot for snapshots but my wife would like to get back to doing some more "artistic" photography when she retires next year.

We've both used film SLRs in the past (Canon Rebel) but neither of us has done much more than snapshooting w digital cameras. The plethora of unnecessary features and impenetrable nested menus real make them difficult to use...

Hello Swamp,

I agree that many cameras today have menus buried inside menus. I’ve made my living as a commercial photographer for decades and some of those “simple” point and shoot cameras make my head spin.

Maybe because I began with manual camera and a hand held meter but whatever the reason the choices that include blinking lights, images of mountain ranges and soccer players are not helpful.

I don’t want to steer you away from Canon if you’re comfortable with the brand. They are an excellent company but I’m mostly familiar with Nikon and Sony (excluding large pro cameras).

If you want SLR the Nikon D800 or D810 (about 36 MP) are more resolution than most people can use. It would supply quality images to meet any use you might have including very large prints and plenty of image quality to do drastic crops and still have sharpness to spare.

Nikon

If you want smaller, more economical and simpler than an SLR the Sony A6000 (24 MP) has very good resolution, is super lightweight and is fun to use. It produces amazing images and although not the ultimate resolution of the Nikon it’s what I use when I go out to capture images for fun. The Sony sensor shares color personality with Nikon and for good reason. They supply the 36 MP sensor for Nikon.

Sony

Sony offers custom Zeiss zoom lenses in their mount system. Zeiss glass is expensive but color is excellent, same company that made glass for Hasselblad (moon camera).

Safe place to buy either is B&H in New York if you don’t have someone local. They are incredibly honest, not like some mail order houses that promise and don’t deliver.

Feel free to email me if you need help or I’m glad to spend phone time. Hope whatever you choose you and your wife enjoy the creative time together.

albertporter

Owner
Swampwalker
.....can recommend an advanced amateur digital SLR? We've got some decent point and shoot for snapshots but my wife would like to get back to doing some more "artistic" photography when she retires next year.

We've both used film SLRs in the past (Canon Rebel) but neither of us has done much more than snapshooting w digital cameras. The plethora of unnecessary features and impenetrable nested menus real make them difficult to use...

Hello Swamp,

I agree that many cameras today have menus buried inside menus. I’ve made my living as a commercial photographer for decades and some of those “simple” point and shoot cameras make my head spin.

Maybe because I began with manual camera and a hand held meter but whatever the reason the choices that include blinking lights, images of mountain ranges and soccer players are not helpful.

I don’t want to steer you away from Canon if you’re comfortable with the brand. They are an excellent company but I’m mostly familiar with Nikon and Sony (excluding large pro cameras).

If you want SLR the Nikon D800 or D810 (about 36 MP) are more resolution than most people can use. It would supply quality images to meet any use you might have including very large prints and plenty of image quality to do drastic crops and still have sharpness to spare.

Nikon

If you want smaller, more economical and simpler than an SLR the Sony A6000 (24 MP) has very good resolution, is super lightweight and is fun to use. It produces amazing images and although not the ultimate resolution of the Nikon it’s what I use when I go out to capture images for fun. The Sony sensor shares color personality with Nikon and for good reason. They supply the 36 MP sensor for Nikon.

Sony

Sony offers custom Zeiss zoom lenses in their mount system. Zeiss glass is expensive but color is excellent, same company that made glass for Hasselblad (moon camera).

Safe place to buy either is B&H in New York if you don’t have someone local. They are incredibly honest, not like some mail order houses that promise and don’t deliver.

Feel free to email me if you need help or I’m glad to spend phone time. Hope whatever you choose you and your wife enjoy the creative time together.

albertporter

Owner
Swampwalker
.....can recommend an advanced amateur digital SLR? We've got some decent point and shoot for snapshots but my wife would like to get back to doing some more "artistic" photography when she retires next year.

We've both used film SLRs in the past (Canon Rebel) but neither of us has done much more than snapshooting w digital cameras. The plethora of unnecessary features and impenetrable nested menus real make them difficult to use...

Hello Swamp,

I agree that many cameras today have menus buried inside menus. I’ve made my living as a commercial photographer for decades and some of those “simple” point and shoot cameras make my head spin.

Maybe because I began with manual camera and a hand held meter but whatever the reason the choices that include blinking lights, images of mountain ranges and soccer players are not helpful.

I don’t want to steer you away from Canon if you’re comfortable with the brand. They are an excellent company but I’m mostly familiar with Nikon and Sony (excluding large pro cameras).

If you want SLR the Nikon D800 or D810 (about 36 MP) are more resolution than most people can use. It would supply quality images to meet any use you might have including very large prints and plenty of image quality to do drastic crops and still have sharpness to spare.

Nikon

If you want smaller, more economical and simpler than an SLR the Sony A6000 (24 MP) has very good resolution, is super lightweight and is fun to use. It produces amazing images and although not the ultimate resolution of the Nikon it’s what I use when I go out to capture images for fun. The Sony sensor shares color personality with Nikon and for good reason. They supply the 36 MP sensor for Nikon.

Sony

Sony offers custom Zeiss zoom lenses in their mount system. Zeiss glass is expensive but color is excellent, same company that made glass for Hasselblad (moon camera).

Safe place to buy either is B&H in New York if you don’t have someone local. They are incredibly honest, not like some mail order houses that promise and don’t deliver.

Feel free to email me if you need help or I’m glad to spend phone time. Hope whatever you choose you and your wife enjoy the creative time together.

albertporter

Owner
Swampwalker
.....can recommend an advanced amateur digital SLR? We've got some decent point and shoot for snapshots but my wife would like to get back to doing some more "artistic" photography when she retires next year.

We've both used film SLRs in the past (Canon Rebel) but neither of us has done much more than snapshooting w digital cameras. The plethora of unnecessary features and impenetrable nested menus real make them difficult to use...

Hello Swamp,

I agree that many cameras today have menus buried inside menus. I’ve made my living as a commercial photographer for decades and some of those “simple” point and shoot cameras make my head spin.

Maybe because I began with manual camera and a hand held meter but whatever the reason the choices that include blinking lights, images of mountain ranges and soccer players are not helpful.

I don’t want to steer you away from Canon if you’re comfortable with the brand. They are an excellent company but I’m mostly familiar with Nikon and Sony (excluding large pro cameras).

If you want SLR the Nikon D800 or D810 (about 36 MP) are more resolution than most people can use. It would supply quality images to meet any use you might have including very large prints and plenty of image quality to do drastic crops and still have sharpness to spare.

Nikon

If you want smaller, more economical and simpler than an SLR the Sony A6000 (24 MP) has very good resolution, is super lightweight and is fun to use. It produces amazing images and although not the ultimate resolution of the Nikon it’s what I use when I go out to capture images for fun. The Sony sensor shares color personality with Nikon and for good reason. They supply the 36 MP sensor for Nikon.

Sony

Sony offers custom Zeiss zoom lenses in their mount system. Zeiss glass is expensive but color is excellent, same company that made glass for Hasselblad (moon camera).

Safe place to buy either is B&H in New York if you don’t have someone local. They are incredibly honest, not like some mail order houses that promise and don’t deliver.

Feel free to email me if you need help or I’m glad to spend phone time. Hope whatever you choose you and your wife enjoy the creative time together.

albertporter

Owner
Swampwalker
.....can recommend an advanced amateur digital SLR? We've got some decent point and shoot for snapshots but my wife would like to get back to doing some more "artistic" photography when she retires next year.

We've both used film SLRs in the past (Canon Rebel) but neither of us has done much more than snapshooting w digital cameras. The plethora of unnecessary features and impenetrable nested menus real make them difficult to use...

Hello Swamp,

I agree that many cameras today have menus buried inside menus. I’ve made my living as a commercial photographer for decades and some of those “simple” point and shoot cameras make my head spin.

Maybe because I began with manual camera and a hand held meter but whatever the reason the choices that include blinking lights, images of mountain ranges and soccer players are not helpful.

I don’t want to steer you away from Canon if you’re comfortable with the brand. They are an excellent company but I’m mostly familiar with Nikon and Sony (excluding large pro cameras).

If you want SLR the Nikon D800 or D810 (about 36 MP) are more resolution than most people can use. It would supply quality images to meet any use you might have including very large prints and plenty of image quality to do drastic crops and still have sharpness to spare.

Nikon

If you want smaller, more economical and simpler than an SLR the Sony A6000 (24 MP) has very good resolution, is super lightweight and is fun to use. It produces amazing images and although not the ultimate resolution of the Nikon it’s what I use when I go out to capture images for fun. The Sony sensor shares color personality with Nikon and for good reason. They supply the 36 MP sensor for Nikon.

Sony

Sony offers custom Zeiss zoom lenses in their mount system. Zeiss glass is expensive but color is excellent, same company that made glass for Hasselblad (moon camera).

Safe place to buy either is B&H in New York if you don’t have someone local. They are incredibly honest, not like some mail order houses that promise and don’t deliver.

Feel free to email me if you need help or I’m glad to spend phone time. Hope whatever you choose you and your wife enjoy the creative time together.

albertporter

Owner
Swampwalker
.....can recommend an advanced amateur digital SLR? We've got some decent point and shoot for snapshots but my wife would like to get back to doing some more "artistic" photography when she retires next year.

We've both used film SLRs in the past (Canon Rebel) but neither of us has done much more than snapshooting w digital cameras. The plethora of unnecessary features and impenetrable nested menus real make them difficult to use...

Hello Swamp,

I agree that many cameras today have menus buried inside menus. I’ve made my living as a commercial photographer for decades and some of those “simple” point and shoot cameras make my head spin.

Maybe because I began with manual camera and a hand held meter but whatever the reason the choices that include blinking lights, images of mountain ranges and soccer players are not helpful.

I don’t want to steer you away from Canon if you’re comfortable with the brand. They are an excellent company but I’m mostly familiar with Nikon and Sony (excluding large pro cameras).

If you want SLR the Nikon D800 or D810 (about 36 MP) are more resolution than most people can use. It would supply quality images to meet any use you might have including very large prints and plenty of image quality to do drastic crops and still have sharpness to spare.

Nikon

If you want smaller, more economical and simpler than an SLR the Sony A6000 (24 MP) has very good resolution, is super lightweight and is fun to use. It produces amazing images and although not the ultimate resolution of the Nikon it’s what I use when I go out to capture images for fun. The Sony sensor shares color personality with Nikon and for good reason. They supply the 36 MP sensor for Nikon.

Sony

Sony offers custom Zeiss zoom lenses in their mount system. Zeiss glass is expensive but color is excellent, same company that made glass for Hasselblad (moon camera).

Safe place to buy either is B&H in New York if you don’t have someone local. They are incredibly honest, not like some mail order houses that promise and don’t deliver.

Feel free to email me if you need help or I’m glad to spend phone time. Hope whatever you choose you and your wife enjoy the creative time together.

albertporter

Owner
Swampwalker
.....can recommend an advanced amateur digital SLR? We've got some decent point and shoot for snapshots but my wife would like to get back to doing some more "artistic" photography when she retires next year.

We've both used film SLRs in the past (Canon Rebel) but neither of us has done much more than snapshooting w digital cameras. The plethora of unnecessary features and impenetrable nested menus real make them difficult to use...

Hello Swamp,

I agree that many cameras today have menus buried inside menus. I’ve made my living as a commercial photographer for decades and some of those “simple” point and shoot cameras make my head spin.

Maybe because I began with manual camera and a hand held meter but whatever the reason the choices that include blinking lights, images of mountain ranges and soccer players are not helpful.

I don’t want to steer you away from Canon if you’re comfortable with the brand. They are an excellent company but I’m mostly familiar with Nikon and Sony (excluding large pro cameras).

If you want SLR the Nikon D800 or D810 (about 36 MP) are more resolution than most people can use. It would supply quality images to meet any use you might have including very large prints and plenty of image quality to do drastic crops and still have sharpness to spare.

Nikon

If you want smaller, more economical and simpler than an SLR the Sony A6000 (24 MP) has very good resolution, is super lightweight and is fun to use. It produces amazing images and although not the ultimate resolution of the Nikon it’s what I use when I go out to capture images for fun. The Sony sensor shares color personality with Nikon and for good reason. They supply the 36 MP sensor for Nikon.

Sony

Sony offers custom Zeiss zoom lenses in their mount system. Zeiss glass is expensive but color is excellent, same company that made glass for Hasselblad (moon camera).

Safe place to buy either is B&H in New York if you don’t have someone local. They are incredibly honest, not like some mail order houses that promise and don’t deliver.

Feel free to email me if you need help or I’m glad to spend phone time. Hope whatever you choose you and your wife enjoy the creative time together.

albertporter

But I did want to ask you, Albert, if you can recommend an advanced amateur digital SLR? We've got some decent point and shoot for snapshots but my wife would like to get back to doing some more "artistic" photography when she retires next year. We've both used film SLRs in the past (Canon Ftb, F-1,
Rebel) but neither of us has done much more than snapshooting w digital cameras. The plethora of unneccesary features and impenetrable nested menus real make them difficult to use, IMO. So ease of use and ease of adjustment would be a primary criterion.
TIA

swampwalker

Displaying posts 351 - 375 of 4740 in total