Description

This is a project that's been on going since the days of my Lenco experiments. My Lenco project is posted as a virtual system here at Audiogon too.

My Technics SP10 MK2 in custom African Wenge plinth is posted in my main system and this Technics SP10 MK3 in Panzerholz and Ebony Plinth was completed November 20th, 2008.

More images to follow, including the Ebony custom platform it will rest on. The platform is 9 layer construction including a layer of Texas Instruments shield with active ground plane.
Read more...

Components Toggle details

    • Technics SP-10 mkIII
    This is to document my Technics SP10 MK 3 project
    • Technics SP-10 mkIII
    Finish view with SME 312S and Air Tight PC-1, now replaced with Air Tight Supreme
    • Technics SP-10 mkIII
    Detail of copper clad platter assembly,
    • Technics SP-10 mkIII
    Chassis with platter removed. This uses a record cutting motor for drive system,
    • Technics SP-10 mkIII
    Detail of construction of Ebony plinth
    • Technics SP-10 mkIII
    Detail of Ebony plinth construction
    • Technics SP-10 mkIII
    Detail of rotor-motor. Underside of Technics MK3 platter.
    • Technics SP-10 mkIII
    Panzerholz construction core for project. Completed plinth with Ebony lumber exterior and hardware is approximately $3800.00
    • Technics SP-10 mkIII
    Panzerholz assembly with Technics SP10 MK2 for basic measurements. Core Panzerholz plinth with no finish is approximately $1800.00

Comments 178

Showing all comments by drajreynolds.

View all comments

Gentlemen,

The platter for vacuum equipped Basis turntables also has the four veins as Mike describes for his Rockport. I can't imaging playing warped LPs without a "proper" vacuum hold down system. Even my most warped LPs have zero give under them when the vacuum hold down system is engaged. Every LP is tightly coupled to the platter.

I agree with Albert that better control over speed stability pays big dividends which is why I invested a considerable sum of money into the Basis Synchro-Wave power supply and requisite mods to the stock motor.

I have spent a fair amount of time with a Continuum Caliburn and Cobra combination that was properly setup and dialed in (by the designer no less) and the science behind each design/engineering choice can clearly be heard in that case.

At the end of the day each approach (direct drive vs belt drive, servo controlled/corrected motor versus obsessive engineering tolerances, linear tracking tonearm versus pivoted tonearm, unipivot versus gimbal bearings, air bearing versus mechanically grounded bearing, etc) has its own set of strengths and weaknesses which just goes to show that there are many paths to satisfaction.

I would be willing to bet that the audible (and measurable) differences between any two pairs of loudspeakers, in room, is far greater than the sonic difference between any two competently designed analog front ends regardless of design choice.

Aaron

drajreynolds

Hi Albert,

Interesting comments on the Einstein phono stage. Is it quieter in your system than the Aesthetix Io? Do you think that the balanced version of the Einstein would offer any sonic advantage above and beyond the SE version? I guess this depends on whether it slots into a truly balanced system.

In what ways does the Io hold a sonic edge over the Einstein in your system?

Lovely looking turntable you have there BTW, a true labour of love I'm sure.

Best Regards,
Aaron

drajreynolds