Dear Peterayer, der Drajreynolds, let me add my two cents here, as I have had some experiences in the past 2 years in setting up Minus-Ks and Vibraplanes in several systems.
It would be contra-productive to place both - motor as well as plinth/turntable - each on it's own Minus-K. There would be constant relative-movement and that would certainly made the concept of thread-drive with calculated slippage impossible to implement.
The inertia unit itself runs very smooth, is very heavy and well damped and I do not think that there is any significant risk that it would induce extra vibrations into the turntable itself.
The MInus-K provides excellent results ONLY, if the turntable is placed dead center.
It is not easy to set-up correctly and may very well put one's nerves to the test.
It's full mechanical suspension, based on a one-point dead center concept is the Minus-K's big advantage and provides indeed excellent (far better in terms of much lower resonance frequency provided) results. When used with a thread drive concept one must make sure however that the tension of the belt is pre-calculated into the center-concept and request.
The Vibraplane does not go as low in frequency resonance as the Minus-K. But it is much more easy to set up.
An active Vibraplane by Kinetic Systems is a different subject. One must not forget the even more costly solutions by Halyconics.
The Vibraplane under Syntax' amps does indeed bring significant results. The Lamm power amplifiers do feature large, single pc board for the whole circuit. These large pc boards are dead stiff bolted to the cabinet. Thus all mechanical vibrations picked up by the cabinet are directly conducted to the circuit. Hence the isolation provided by the Vibraplanes are pretty significant here.
Syntax knows his stuff.
In a few weeks Syntax will be able to give first impressions about active air suspension in turntable set-up and it's virtues ....
Cheers,
D.