Description

The system has evolved over a 20 year period and will probably continue to evolve. It is in a dedicated room that is approximately 19' by 27' by 10' with oak floors and oriental carpets. I also use a minimal number of diffusers on the wall behind the speakers and eight of the 16" ASC Tube Traps. The room has 5 dedicated circuits for the audio.

There have been a number of evolutionary changes over the last year, primarily with respect to the power cords, speakerwire and interconnect and one rather dramatic change, the replacement of the EMM Labs XDS1 with the Esoteric P-02/ D-02. This yielded lower noise and increased detail and bass control while maintaining the musicality of the EMM Labs. I would consider the Esoteric pieces breakthrough products. Funny how you sometimes deviate from your plans. My system seems to go through extended periods without major changes, then have a number at the same time. I do have my eyes on a new cartridge and perhaps a new preamp.
Read more...

Components Toggle details

    • Rockport Technologies Sirius
    I purchased an early Sirius from Andy Payor thinking that I had purchased the ultimate turntable, only to spend the next five years updating. The updates have included the air isolation base, a series of different motors and tonearms, an outboard power supply for the motor, a 50# platter, new arm wiring and a variety of different belts culminating in a custom aramid fiber belt. As currently constituted, I think that it combines the high definition of the Sirius II without its tendency toward coldness.
    • Einstein The Tube Mk II
    Similar in many ways to the CTC Blowtorch but harmonically richer and more complex with greater dynamics and significantly better image density. Phenomenal bass, ultra quiet, very extended upper octaves.
    • Yamaha CT-7000
    Ebony with black faceplate. Particularly nice top end coupled with an ability under the best circumstances to recreate a three dimensional soundstage. After owning a number of Magnum Dynalabs, this has been a real eye opener.
    • Acapella Triolons
    The Triolons are an imposing sight. Two woofer towers, each 14" by 28" by 7' tall, each weighing 650# plus a cross piece holding a plasma tweeter attached to the woofers and a sword bearing two horn loaded speakers, one horn 30.5" in diameter, the other 18.5" in diameter. The Triolons can be driven by a single amps of 18 watts or higher power but must be triwired and have an efficiency of 97 db. Each side weighs 850# total. The crossover points are 200, 700 and 5000 hz. The sound from 200 hz up to 40,000 hz emanates as a spherical wavefront. The Campanile Highs are similar but crossover to their woofers at 700 hz, use the plasma tweeter plus a single horn and are much lower in efficiency (92 db). The Triolons are typically a 6 ohm speaker but have an impedance at 30 hz of 28 ohms. The same is true of the Campaniles. Neither is a particularly easy load for an amp to drive; however the greater efficiency of the Triolons does open up the possibility of driving them with the right low power amplifier. Unlike the ribbon tweeter of the Magnepans, the Acapella's tweeter does not over shadow the other drivers. Extremely dynamic.
    • Jorma Prime
    The Jorma Prime, either in balanced or single ended configuration is superb, particularly between amp and preamp but also on other inputs. I still use the balanced 7N Mexcel on the X01 and the Valhalla on the TT but otherwise have switched to the Jorma Prime.
    • Finite Elemente Pagode Master Reference
    5 shelf version installed as well as the amp stands. Again a nice and very audible improvement. Amazing the things that you blame on the equipment until you solve the resonance problems. Basically a no brainer. More improvement than changing a major piece of equipment.
    • Jorma Prime
    I have been mildly dissatisfied for a number of years with my JC-1 amps when used to drive the Acapella speakers but have yet to find something that combined the ability to drive the speakers and give me the other characteristcs that I desired although I have been much taken with some tubed amps (small, single ended or OTL within their power limits. Let's just say that the insertion of a combination of Bi-wire and single wire prime has cused me to re-think the amp question. The Primes are simply the most musical natural top to bottom cables that I have ever encountered.
    • Halcyonics Micro 40
    Isolation base
    • Audio Note Balanced Kegons
    transformer coupled, silver wired, balanced, SET mono pair, 23 watts output
    • Ortofon MC-90
    minimal body mass, excellent sound; more liquidity in the highs than the Titan i
    • Weizhi AC Line Filter
    6 outlet
    • Stage III Zyklops
    Power cord
    • Stage III Minotaur
    AC power cord
    • Ypsilon MC-16 Step up transformer
    Step up transformer for low output moving coil catridge
    • Ypsilon VPS 100 phono stage
    Tubed phono stage
    • Lurne Record clamp
    record clamp
    • Finite Elemente Cerabases
    german engineered isolation feet
    • Esoteric P-02
    Esoteric's next to top of the line transport.
    • Esoteric D-02
    Esoteric's latest thinking on D/A converters.

Comments 280

Showing all comments by coffeecupman.

View all comments

I have had the pleasure of auditioning Fred's system through some of its recent developments.
I can confirm that the involvement of the Jorma Prime has had a startling (positive) effect on the system. At first, a few months ago, the Prime was installed on the bass portion only of Fred's setup, with a lesser Jorma on the mids and highs (I am not familiar with the specific name of that cable). At the time I heard this setup, it seemed to me that the bass had been "unleashed". This wasn't really a good thing at the time, because it put the system out of balance, and even with the Triolon mids set at their highest setting, the bass seemed to be at such a level that this unbalance could not be ignored. In this regard, my impression at the time was that the system "half-Primed", was a step in the wrong direction.

Nonetheless, Fred doubtless heard the potential of the bass, and he persevered. I'm really glad he did. Now he has the Prime on the mids and highs as well. Now the whole system has been "unleashed", and in balance with itself. What he has said above regarding better bass, dynamics, and a new degree of low level detail is absolutely right. I have known for a long time that cables can make a significant difference, but this cable really is something special. Which is particularly annoying when one contemplates its price point! I would also add to his comments that his imaging has improved ever so slightly, which has been the one significant development area that I perceive with the Triolons.

I'd like to touch on that a little more, because I don't want to mention this development area without pointing out a special strength that these speakers have. I'll try to explain...

While each of us enjoy each other's music, Fred and I have, naturally, different foci regarding our taste. It has been my experience that Fred likes large orchestras with big crashing dynamics and very complex arrangements. It is for this reason that Fred's speakers of choice are very appropriately the Triolons. With the Triolons, every instrument gets its own space, and it really lives and breathes, unmolested, in that space. This is, of course, critical for the evaluation of complex, dynamic music. However, the price paid for this broad tapestry seems to be an inability to pinpoint in space just exactly where that instrument is in front of you.

I should mention at this point that I'm "image-spoiled". I've been living with big electrostats for a long time now, and I'm used to finger-pointable sound. BUT, that's only half the story when it comes to my preferences...

...because my musical focus is also on smaller bands. I like Classic Rock and Jazz, and am experimenting into some old Country stuff. I went to RMAF this year with Fred, and my preference there was the High Campanile Acapellas, over the Triolons. Now, it wasn't apples to apples at that show, and part of the magic in the Campanile room might have been the FM Acoustics amps vs. the Einsteins, and the rooms themselves were very different, as was the cabling, and even power conditioning, which 2007 taught me is very significant.

But since then I've been thinking a lot about this, and I think it is possible that I preferred the Campaniles because I like smaller bands, with less going on. There seems to me to possibly be a greater integration and image specificity (despite a comparative limit in "sonic scale") with just the single horn and tweeter, as opposed to the two horns and tweeter in the Triolon (I have to say "possibly" because, again, the system differences at RMAF [the only place I've heard Campaniles] were too great for a conclusive comparison). Bass extension and authority certainly is superior in the Triolons, but how much content below 40Hz is there in my classic rock? I am of course aware that in many recordings there is SOME, and I'm committed to getting at it, but whatever content that is down in that region certainly wouldn't have the kind of complexity that one would experience in an orchestra. I think with my tastes I could get away with pairing High Campaniles with 18-40Hz subs and be VERY happy.

So I think it's important in considering the Acapella line what kind of music you listen to most. If you like orchestras, then the Triolons are clearly going to be the champs. It seems extremely unlikely that the Campaniles will be able to handle that sheer quantity of instruments like the Triolons do, because the Triolons truly excel at this, and that's exactly what Fred is after. On the other hand, if you like intimate, 4 piece bands or rock and roll, and you want the performance to image strongly in front of you, the Campaniles might be where you should stop, because they will probably do everything you need. I'm sure this is just a non-technical way of stating what Fred has already mentioned about lower-bass authority and the other qualities of his speakers. Horses for courses.

Fred is right that the JC-1's are doing an outstanding job. It is the unfortunate curse of these and many other great pieces that rarely do they get a chance to demonstrate their best qualities in synergy with other components of the celsitude found in Fred's system. And even then, cable changes can still yield a surprise like this! I think the world of the JC-1's (I use them myself and they were my first piece of "great gear"), and am happy to hear them perform in this way, much closer to their potential than I can reach with my current setup. Naturally it goes without saying that I will be very keen to listen should Fred start experimenting with other amplifiers.

In conclusion, I have never heard Fred's system sound better than it does now, with the Jorma Prime speaker wire installed from top to bottom. To anyone considering fitting their system with the Prime, I personally wouldn't recommend doing it half and half, as the experience could be unsettling. Although expensive and wonderful cable, it does not seem to "play well with others", even in the same Jorma family. When you have it all installed from top to bottom, however, you are going to know about it. The performance is superb. I'm not surprised that this is in the same price category as Nordost's Odin. If I was in the market for Odin speaker cable, I'd definitely audition the Jorma Prime first.

I apologize if this comment is long-winded. It's my first review of Fred's system, and it's long overdue.

ccm

coffeecupman