Dimensions: 21’ × 16’ Large
Ceiling: 10’
Hello,
I was offered to buy from my local Acoustical Systems dealer the New Aquilar arm to replace the Brinkman 10.5 I have on my Bardo.
While it will be a costly adventure (the price il get on the Brinkman and the gap to pay for the Aquilar)
I am thinking about it.
The “Problem” is while the Aquilar get some “words” on the web around the forums (here in particular) its still didn’t known around and reviewed to determine (at least virtually) its benefits against other reference tone arms. I know it got the grand prix price in japan, but other then that (I cant read Japanese any way) I have zero ground to establish any differences that I might get from this $$ flip.
I will appreciates any thoughts, ideas, encouragements or diss to do it…
Hopping some one has experience with the two and can share his conclusions, or any one have a way to think it over cause’ I’m “Lost” J
Thank you.
Dear Drajreynolds:
How are you?
It has been two month from my last post at your system, and here I am again.
I’m happy to inform you I went and bought the archon to replace my zyx airy3 and I’m super loving it! As you mentioned in our correspond – it is more musical but have a lot to his virtues above the rest, his neutrality and detailed in the right perspective are pure magic. It was a great but from my part, so thanks for drive me in to it.
Now About the Aquilar you mentioned in our previous, I was posting a question in the Analog sub-forum here on Audiogon, but I know you know them well and the Brinkman to compare so here I am again.
Can you point out the diferances between those arm and what can I expect if I mount the Aquilar on my Bardo instead of Brinkman top model 10.5 arm?
Thank you very much!
Yours, Aviad.