A whole year and no changes to my system, who'd have thought? Not me having spent the last decade constantly making changes.
That's not to say I've not been tempted and other equipment hasn't passed through.
The preamp session alluded to by Paul in his post on this thread was my real eye opener.
It's easy to carried away considering whats 'best' andimposing ones view of how music should be presented in the home. The pre shootout experience demonstrated how different everyones taste is. I guess even in the concert hall we all have our preference, some like to be close and immersed, others, me included, like to look into the performance from a distance.
The experience also demonstrated that expectation of equipment can be easily confounded by it's use in a new room and system.
I was keen to pit my Aesthetix against some of it's natural competitors as well as seeing how it might stand up to competition from a couple of pre's with stellar reputations.
I've heard the ARC Ref3 in more than one system that I've enjoyed and it or a REF5 have been top of my list of pre's within budget to try. That opportunity arose as a friend broke down his system, something I know he's loath to do and kindly added it to the mix for a day here. To it was also added a Puresound L300, Audio Note UK M5, Shindo Vosne Romanee and Robert Koda K-10. All the pre's are a step up in price from mine, some more than others!
Now the interesting bit... It would be true to say that all of these pres offered something or other that mine misses. In particular greater detail and weight, bass lines were punchier and more solid. I can understand the strong preference some had for this addition to the presentation. However it tended to change the perspective of the system. The soundstaging took a couple of steps forward running the L300, Ref3 and M5. That more immersive sound I mentioned. Too much for my liking, though I'd imagine others would have a strong preference for this vantage.
I also had the immpression that while this added weight was beneficial with some material there was also a slight tendency toward over emphasis. Now, having heard the Ref3 in a much better environment for listening than my room I'd tend to think the room and it's synergy with my system the main culprit. In another system these pre's could likely sound more neutral.
That said there were a couple of jokers. The Shindo sounded beautiful and didn't change the persepective, it was new with only a few hours on it and there was comment that bass was a little light using it. I'd guess the bass would fill out as it broke in and it'd be interesting to know what effect that'd have on the perspective. In any case I didn't have a problem with the bass and it delivered a musicality that only really superior tube amps seem to be able to achieve. Neutral? Who cares it was beautiful.
So to the Robert Koda. It somehow seemed to offer all the benefits of the other pre's without changing the perspective. The comment from others was that it sounded wonderfully neutral (in the best possible sense). It just seemed to let the music flow unhindered by comparison to the other pre's on the day. I enjoyed it most as it retained what I like about the sound of my system but gave me more of it. A wonderful piece of kit that I'm sure it would sound better and better with sympathetic equipment of a level beyond my system.
The upshot of the day was I decided to stick with what I have, I get great enjoyment from it. Should funds ever become available to begin to dabble in the Koda direction it'd be one I'd persue. For now though it's time to put on another cd.