Description

The system has been cobbled together over several years. Everything listed has been bought used over time with the exception of the carts, the phono stage, and some Jade Audio interconnects (but perhaps surprisingly, only a few pieces were acquired through an Audiogon intro). I am very happy with the system as it is. Without having delved into Audiogon early on, I doubt I would have gone down the road for used components this far. Without the collective input and gathered wisdom of fellow Audiogoners who freely offer their expertise and insight, getting to this point would have taken me longer than it has. For this, I thank Audiogon's forum members.

Jadis Eurythmie speakers:

Large horns (see the picture above) with wonderful, liquid sound. While the mid-range horns are wonderful, the beautiful bass reproduction and super-tweeters make the mids sound so much better than I thought they could. I bought these in a store where I could compare them against megadollar speakers at the time (2003) and these lacked nothing. Anyone who has listened to and loved big mid-range horns will know what I mean when I say it will be tough making me go back to box speakers.

The Jadis JP 80 pre-amp came before the EMM combo or else I might have skipped it and just gone with the pre-amp section in the DCC2, which works extremely well as a linestage on its own. The JP80 is slightly euphonic but I have, for now, come to the conclusion that the coloration pleases me far more than it displeases me so I stick with it. I am considering some modifications to improve low-level detail retrieval. I am using a ZYX Artisan as a phono stage, and the EMM Labs CDSD/DCC2 as a digital source. The generally glowing reviews on the 'gon of the CDSD/DCC2 are really well-deserved. I have yet to hear a digital source I'd rather use.

The amps are holdovers from my first real system, which had speakers which required more power than the Eurythmies do. I have always appreciated these amps, whether with box speakers, electrostats, or now horns. They provide great reserves of power and control the Eurythmies extremely well - 300Bs are OK for Mozart piano sonatas but leave one wondering where the bass went when moving to anything which goes below 180Hz. I have generally read that conventional wisdom calls the big VTL amps "dark" and I guess I can see where that comes from, but they work wonders for me. The VTLs are not "sweet" the way my EAR 859 integrated (now used as a headphone amp) can be at the top end, but I have yet to find a tube amp I prefer overall.

The Micro Seiki turntable is a recent-ish acquisition which I am working on bringing back to life. I hope to have it up and running in a few weeks/months (the whole thing weighs a short ton and takes up rack space I don't have so I am having a new rack/table built for it). I will update as I get this done. In the meantime...

UPDATE

The TT set-up currently in use is a late 1970s Yamaha PX-1 linear-tracking DD table, the precursor to the better-known (in the US) PX-2. For a DD turntable, it weighs a short ton. The speed appears to be quite stable, adjustments are very easy, and the fact that it is automatic makes life very easy sometimes. The PX-1 is currently running with a Denon DL103R (and a DL102 mono cart) through the ZYX Artisan phono stage. I am extremely happy with the Artisan. The Artisan is extremely quiet and in my experience, as neutral as can be ("despite" the fact it is solid state); one wek in I was a fan, and months later, there is no change to my fanhood and no complaints whatsoever). It may be my lack of expertise in set-up, but the ZYX shows that the cart isn't the strong link in this particular analog chain.

Update 10/31/06: An upcoming move will allow me more space (and better ergonomics for using the system) and will probably allow me some ability to treat the room. This is something I am looking forward to because the room now is by far the weakest part of the system. Wish me luck!

Update 03/06/07: Moved finally but a 2+ month business trip in the interim has left me with boxes still to unpack, a living room to tweak (because as is it sounds terrible), and a new rack to acquire. But... it has also led to the purchase of some Purist Dominus Rev B PCs (used), and a couple of pair of Jade Audio interconnects. I happened to run across a Jadis JF-1 crossover as well in the interim, which sorely tempted me. How could I turn down the chance to get the crossover specifically designed to power my speakers? The answer is I couldn't, so it's there too. Now I have to get another two channels of amplification somewhere!

Update: In the last 2-3yrs, I have been playing with DD turntables, including some of the great ones from the 1970s and 80s. They are shockingly good in some cases, and represent surprisingly good value. After listening to a few of the "lower" priced tables (PL-7L, Diatone LT-1) and the Yamaha PX-1 intensively, I went out to stereo stores to listen to newer setups, specifically listening to them with Denon 103R because it was going to be frowned upon by dealers as a lesser cart. I found nothing them wanting for nothing when compared to new table+arm setups until multiples of the older DDs' market price. The Yamaha PX-1 loses to the Micro Seiki in noise floor, but not by a lot. The P3 is a monster, where the torque difference is readily apparent. It sounds quieter than its specs. The Denon DP80 I also have a few unplinthed TTs I have been waiting to plinth before actually doing my own shoot-out review. Not sure if I am ever going to get there, and at this point, I think I should probably let some go. I really only "need" 1 or 2 per system. (heh-heh).

Update 10/19/09: it has been ages since I updated the system to mention some of the other tables which make it on to the main shelves from time to time. They are included in the system description (with pics in most cases). Maybe I'll add commentary here sometime. The newest addition is a Denon DP-100 with SME 3012R Pro arm. It is super-quiet and super speed-stable. I have only used it a few days so far but it is fantastic. It deserves its reputation.
Read more...

Components Toggle details

    • Jadis Eurythmie II
    4-way front-loaded 104db horn speakers; twin isobaric woofers (per speaker) good for 20Hz. Love'em or hate'em looks.
    • VTL MB 450 Signature
    tube monoblocks; 8 6550s each; tetrode/triode switchable (450 watts in tetrode, 225 watts in triode).
    • Jadis JF-1
    2-Way active tube crossover, specifically designed for the Jadis Eurythmie speakers, with a crossover point at 180Hz. 12db slope I believe.
    • Jadis JP 80
    two chassis preamp with MM phono stage (not MC version). Single-digit serial number so an earlier version...
    • EMM CDSD
    CD/SACD transport
    • EMM DCC2
    CDSD-matching DAC with built-in line stage.
    • ZYX Artisan
    MC/MM phono stage (CR-type equalizer) with 55dB of gain (MC); red lacquer version. So-called "battery-powered" but bps doesn't last long.
    • Micro Seiki SX-8000
    TT#1: early 80s Japanese monster. 60lb platter, heavier base, air bearing. Separate motor and air pump. Mounts for 4 arms.
    • Triplanar VII
    Not set up yet. Soon to be on the Micro Seiki.
    • ZYX UNIverse S
    Nakatsuka-san's finest. Soon to be on the Triplanar which will be on the Micro Seiki.
    • Micro Seiki Max-237
    OK arm.
    • Denon DN-308F
    This table was Denon's last and greatest turntable console for professional use (unless they make another one). It was launched in the early 1980s as a follow-on from the DN-307F, and is said to have the highest torque of any turntable ever made. The AC-servo 3-pole brushless motor plays 33, 45, and 78 rpm vinyl with supreme accuracy and stability, and for all of you budding DJs out there, it has a handy braking and clutch system for cueing records to the head of the song quite quickly. It comes with a giant, relatively thick, MDF casing, which helps the weight up to 180lbs. It has a large 14" turntable, with a huge motor (looks like a can of paint) inside the casing. It comes with its own arm, a long-armed version of the DA-308, which is set up specifically to use the DL-103 as its cart. The arm is probably not the best out there, but handily, there are some SME armbases which work with the DN-308F if you want to use an SME 3012R. Note, it takes a very short headshell, or a headshell with long mounting holes (so you can place the cart well back). It has far more 'stuff' than a regular record player - much of which is specifically for studio use, not home use but some of which is wonderful for home use. From left to right on the front panel of the console, it has an on/off toggle, a speaker grille, and a dead-man switch (with stylus down, you can dig for the start of the song, go back a quarter turn, and when you press play, it will be spinning perfectly at the start of the song) for monitor use (for cueing records), which can either be used with the built-in mini-speaker, or special headphones (Elaga DR-631C, 10kOhms, #110 jacks). In the middle it has a tone control (which I have not yet figured out cleanly), PLAY and STOP buttons, and a balance knob, and then an attenuator with an ATTENUATOR START button (which if on, means that you can start the record by turning on the attenuator (allows a one-motion start and volume fade-in after you've cued using the monitor)). It has a LINE OUT toggle which turns on the line-out amp functionality. On the main plate on the front right, it has a 33/45/78 toggle with a green lamp straight from the 50s. On the back panel, there are two VU meters and a stereo/mono switch. On the top is a handy place to display the current record playing. Inside the box, there are some juicy bits too. If you open the front panel, you can get to the electronics, which are 1) a massive power supply, 2) a line amp, and 3) a fully balanced (reportedly) MC head amp and RIAA phono stage built in. There are some end-user available adjustments to make inside such as raising output by 6dB, a phase toggle, and a switch to use if you are going to be mixing from two tables through a board. The line amp outputs a 600ohm signal of something in the 1.0-1.5V range, and can drive amplifiers directly via XLR cable (which is why this works great in homes - the TT can be away from the speakers, even in a different room, and XLR cables can run straight to the amplifier with very long runs (2-pin is hot)). The tonearm cable can be unplugged from the headamp/RIAA/lineamp circuitry and routed out the back to your own phono stage if you like. It is built for radio station abuse, though the interesting thing is that right when this came out, radio stations, concert halls, and recording studios all over Japan decided they had huge budgets to buy these, did so, and then really never used them. The result is that the condition of these can be variable, but a fair percentage (of an admittedly limited number extant) are in decent condition even today. In addition, Denon will still service these. What could be better? The casing could be better. Supreme execution would include replacing the MDF structure with something like a giant laminated maple or cherry structure top plate to be mounted on legs (with the electronic innards hanging below, or housed in a box below the plinth?), perhaps placed on a minus-K platform. If one rebuilt the top plate structure, there would be plenty of room for a second or third arm as well, especially if one moved the stereo/mono switch to the front panel somehow. Elsewhere, the front panel attenuator and speaker could be better, but both are easily replaceable (and neither matter if you are using your own phono stage). HOWEVER, all in all, this is a fabulous piece of kit, and has to go down as one of the great DD TTs made.
    • Denon DP-100
    Denon's top of the line consumer table, built with their AU-196 out-rotor 3-phase AC servo motor (in the ad copy, originally designed to be a cutting lathe motor). Like other Denons, it also uses the magnetic pulse system on the inner rim of the upper platter piece along with a dual PLL quartz lock system to maintain speed stability. However, this time they have made the platter very heavy (6.5kg) so there is a very high moment of inertia, coupled with a very high torque (10kg/cm2) motor (seeing a shot of the motor is a treat in itself - the whole rotor is the size of a can of paint and is one reason why this thing weighs a short ton). One of the least talked-about bits on this TT is the platter. It has a double platter system - the idea taken off the DP80 - but it goes further. The upper platter and lower platter are connected by a leaf spring creating a high-cut filter. The leaf spring is dampened with silicon oil in the damper shaft. The table has pitch control from +9.9& to -9.9% in 0.1% increments. It plays 78s. The one I have has the DK-1000 base, which adds another 15kg to make the thing 63kg - definitely a two-person operation because I can't even get my arms around it even if I could lift it. I don't have have the electronic servo arm - mine is outfitted with an SME 3012R Pro long arm (though other bases are possible). This combination is super-quiet, and super speed-stable, and is among the quietest tables I have ever heard. You know... all the superlatives that people talk about when they get greater detail out of their records - they're all here when I heard this table for the first time - and that was using a pretty good base for comparison. Pics to come.
    • Exclusive P3
    Exclusive was Pioneer's flagship brand of stereo electronics (the company's multi-story HQ-based showroom in the 1990s had a separate floor/room for Exclusive). The P3 was Exclusive's flagship turntable when introduced in 1978. It is about as over-engineered a DD turntable as was made in the late 1970s and early 1980s. It was also, to my knowledge, the most expensive TT sold until Micro Seiki came out with their SX-8000 in 1981, and the P3 was the most expensive direct-drive TT until its successor, the Exclusive P3a. It was 10% more than the Yamaha PX-1 (which itself was 20+% more than the next comer), more than 3x the plinthless/armless Technics SP-10Mk2, 20% more than the Technics SL1000Mk3 (the fully loaded SP-10Mk3) which came a year later, and 40% more than the Sony PS-X9. In short, it was a player among players. It has the largest and most robust form of the Stable Hanging Rotor drive within the Pioneer family, with mammoth torque - 10kg-cm, some 65% more than the Technics SP-10Mk2 - allowing it to attain 33.3rpm in 0.3sec, despite carrying a 16lb platter cut from a block of aluminum. All wow/flutter/accuracy specs were industry bests, and the P3 S/N ratio, while reported at 78dB, was effectively higher than that according to the 1980 turntable shoot-out (see the vintageknob.org for details). The plinth hides an impressive base/isolation system underneath. This is shown under a separate picture. The only thing I can say is... it is wonderful - and frankly, it's a steal given that it comes with a great built-in isolation system, a fantastic high-torque motor, and a great, purpose-built arm.
    • Exclusive P3 - The Innards
    The TT is mounted on a 25kg barium sulfate and aluminum plate structure (see other photo), supported on 3-method suspension system (oil-damping, springs, rubber grommeting) separating it from the lower base. This structure has a resonance of 5Hz, designed to be below minimum expected tonearm resonance. The Brazilian Rosewood 'plinth' is actually not a plinth per se, but a cover to the mechanism. It is only coupled to the lower base - it remains uncoupled from the motor and platter assembly, and the tonearm structure. The whole thing weighs just over 100lb, including turntable mat.
    • Sony PS-X9
    The Sony PS-X9 was Sony's monument to turntable greatness. It is a classic Japanese engineering exercise sold at a terrible loss per table (par for the course for most Sony statement products). Introduced in 1977, it has a fantastically speed-stable motor with massive torque (7kg-cm - 15% higher than the Technics SP-10Mk2 which was the torque king at the time), with a very wide high-inertia platter. It featured a newly designed arm, the PUA-9, a new cart launch around the same time (the XL-55) where the best handpicked examples were named the XL-55 Pro, and reserved for buyers of this TT. Sony admired the top EMT tables for their engineering, and the homage is visible in the design of the PS-X9. In addition, Sony admired the concept of keeping low-level signals to the shortest possible signal path, and so the table featured a built-in MC headamp (the HA-55, designed specifically for the XL-55 cart), and an RIAA phono stage with excellent specs. This was Sony's "Integrated Turntable." The HeadAmp has 27dB of gain, accepting carts of 0.2mV or more (100ohm standard), and the Phono Stage is a direct-coupled dual-FET differential amplifier (36dB gain, ±0.2dB gain from 20Hz to 20kHz). To top it off, the phono stage had variable loading, both for resistance AND capacitance (how many stages do you know have that?). The headamp and the head amp+RIAA combination are both by-passable. The torque on the table is so large that speed stability is completely flat out to several decimal places with up to 1100 grams of tracking force. It comes up to full 33 1/3 rpm in 1/8th of a platter revolution. The table weighs 35kg/77lbs in its birthday suit. Unfortunately for Sony, the table was a result of the product designers completely missing the spirit of the time. As a table oriented to professional use, it was twice as expensive as the then-current non-console mainstay SP-10Mk2 (the Sony TTS-8000, while sporting a pro-series name, ended up more in the hands of audiophiles). As a table oriented to audiophile use, it flopped. The orange sides were meant to be a Sony signature for top-end products, and ended up on only three products to my knowledge. The competitors at the time were all sleek black (the Pioneer PL-L1, the Yamaha PX-1, etc - the high-gloss rosewood tables started arriving a few years later). What's more, while meant to be a more highly-engineered Japanese version of the EMT 930, for those in that market, it was decidedly not an EMT - it was Japanese - not German, and unforgiveably, it was Japanese and orange. Despite its lack of commercial success, it is a great table. I have been playing it for a little while and I think could live with this table for a long time. It is wonderful with a great stonking TT mat. It is even better when placed on a very good isolation platform - I've been a magnetic flotation platform. As a fully integrated (but still quite flexible) unit, it is a real prize.
    • Kenwood L-07D
    Kenwood's greatest TT and one for the ages. On paper, almost the perfect table (at the time). The aim was to re-think the turntable from the ground up, and create an almost completely rigid plinth/motor/tonearm 'pickup loop' so there were no stray vibrations which passed into the cartridge cantilever. The product was introduced at the same time as the Kenwood L-01T tuner and the L-01A integrated amplifier and the three were the first products to wear the Kenwood brand name in Japan (prior to that, it was 'Trio'). The motor used dual-servo coupling, switching the speed control method depending on whether speed was close to desirable or a bit further away. In addition, the motor had an auto-switching method from DC to AC to reduce influences from the motor drive circuit. Torque was 2.5kg-cm and the moment of inertia was 1025kg-cm^2 (which was among the highest of all DDs). All internal wiring was copper litz, and all connections were gold-plated. The platter was quite heavy (12lbs) , made of two layers of aluminum bonded together, with a (non-magnetic) stainless steel turntable sheet was mounted on top of the platter. The static balance arm made of laminated exotic materials fibers (carbon, boron, aluminum, etc) - somewhat similar to the armtube design of the Sony PUA-9 (which came on the PS-X9) it seems - has 'on-the-fly' adjustments possible. The plinth has a place for a second arm to be added. The result was the highest S/N ratio (-94dB) turntable made in Japan at the time (later, the Exclusive P3a had an ever-so-slightly higher S/N ratio (-95dB DIN B)), and something which wowed the world. How does it sound? Fabulous. Very very quiet, and very stable. The arm is not the be all and end all, but it does not sound bad at all (though it doesn't work with the heaviest carts of the time (or now)). The ability to add a second arm is quite convenient, and unusual for flagship DD players which came with a fixed plinth.
    • Nakamichi Dragon CT
    Nakamichi's 'second-best' table. In 1981, Nakamichi introduced what was perhaps the second most expensive TT in Japan (the most expensive being the Micro Seiki SX-8000 with all its associated doodads). It had a single claim to fame, which was that Nakamichi had figured out a way to estimate how far the record was off-center, and adjust the position of the upper platter so that when the lower platter started spinning, there was no visible evidence of the record being off-center. The TX-1000 was a monster in every way (as it should have been at something like $7000 in 1981 dollars (JPY 1.1 million in Japan)). Two years later, Nakamichi released the Dragon CT (the TT shown here). It had a simpler method of finding 'absolute center' and correcting the upper platter. The Dragon CT was lighter, smaller, and according to reports at the time both in Japan and abroad, vastly more reliable. Being #2 did not make it a bargain though as it was more expensive than almost all other manufacturers' #1 table at JPY 400,000.

    The platter is relatively light, motor is not the highest torque out there, and it is not the quietest table (about the same as the Technics SP-10Mk2, the major Denons of the time (at least the ones below the DP-100). However, the real show here was the centering system, which was based off the concept of doing the same thing for tapes in tape decks (azimuth). The original TX-1000 was spec-ed out by Mr. Nakamichi himself while according to the Vintage Knob website, the CT's design was outsourced to someone else.
    • Yamaha PX-1
    TT#2: Linear-tracking arm, direct-drive (slotless DC motor), fully-automatic, separate power supply. Yamaha's flagship, followed by the PX-2 and PX-3 in the few years which followed.
    • Diatone LT-1
    Diatone's flagship linear-tracking direct drive turntable from 1980. Excellent torque, quite high S/N ratio (80dB) for the time, and very low wow/flutter. Two-piece die-cast aluminum and stainless platter to reduce platter resonance. Short arm made of titanium alloy for lightness and strength. Mine is the lighter-colored version, not the darker one shown in the picture.
    • Sony TTS-8000
    Sony's top consumer deck in the mid 1970s, built off the technology of the 2310 and then later a 5-series (where the name escapes me) - which were built to try and compete with the first Technics SP-10. The TTS-8000 was the top Japan-market consumer deck in the late 1970s (the PS-X9 was the top pro deck) though it was not advertised too heavily. Originally sold with arm (either a PUA-1600 long or short arm, or the PUA-9 (which was the stock arm on the PS-X9) or PUA-7)) and plinth, or just as a drive (like mine in the pic). I bought mine as NOS drive and have yet to use it... it's so pretty... (actually, the real problem is a lack of plinth for it now). An early model with black strobe dots on silver background. Nice oil-filled turntable mat. I have a second one for parts just in case... :^)
    • Denon DP-80
    Denon's replacement for the DP-6000 and the new top-of-the-consumer line (excepting the DP-100M which was a pro deck which was also stuck into a frame which could accept a wooden shroud, and sold to a few audiophiles for a stupendously high price (equivalent to $30k in today's dollars if thinking about it in average PPP/household income terms)). As a replacement for the DP-6000, it came with a new, stronger 3-phase motor, and lowered rumble through a new double-layer platter construction. Apparently, if you open it up, the voltage adjustment/controller portion of the speed controller circuitry is something to behold - highly sophisticated. In any case, above and beyond the speed controller, there is a PLL loop and a magnetic pulse system (similar to the system used by Sony at the time) working in combination with it. Denon's claim was that a 250g stylus at the outer edge would not cause the platter to change speed (the P3's claim was that a 1.5kg stylus wouldn't budge it). All in all, a nice table, which deserves a better plinth than I have given it so far.
    • Pioneer PL-7L
    The Japanese version of the PL-90 Elite made from the mid-1980s onward. The PL-7L came out five years after the PL-70LII, which was the trickle-down TT in terms of receiving technology (arm and Stable Hanging Rotor system) from the mighty Exclusive P3 and later P3a. The PL-7L has the same specs as the PL-70LII - very high S/N ratio (85dB) and one of the lowest wow/flutter levels seen on a TT - this time with an interesting built-in isolation damping footer system, and no money spent on veneer. Quite decent torque. A real steal for the money these days in my opinion.
    • Rek-O-Kut Rondine Deluxe B-12H - PROJECT
    old idler wheel drive - to become a project... couldn't resist the looks. The trick now will be to see if I can get the whole thing done with time, elbow grease, and 100 bucks.
    • Denon 103R
    On the PX-1. Old faithful?
    • Microseiki LC-80w
    Very low output MC cart - Micro's top of the line cart in the late 1970s. Very very strange magnet design.
    • Fidelity Research FR-7
    Very heavy, very low compliance LOMC classic from Ikeda-san, to go with his heavy stainless steel arms. Sounds like Jadis on a stick.
    • Fidelity Research FR-7f
    An update to the FR-7 which came out two years after the FR-7 (in 1980) for 40% more money. Like the Fr-7, this also weighed 30g and had an integrated headshell. Output was 0.15mV. Stylus is said to have a square cut of 0.15mm (as opposed to the 0.2mm x 0.3mm semi-elliptical of the original FR-7).
    • Technics 100CMk3
    MM Cart. One of Technics' best. A real giant killer.
    • Technics 100CMk4
    MM cart
    • Grace F9 Ruby
    MM Cart with ruby stylus. Excellent performer for the amount one pays used.
    • Garrott P77
    Wonderful MM cart from the Australian brothers. Very high performance - this cart is one of the ones which 'surprises' me as an MM cart. It has a lot of the characteristics which were used to describe the reasons why MCs are inherently better than MMs.
    • Sony XL55mono
    LOMC (0.2mV) mono version of the XL55 cart introduced to go with the Sony PS-X9 table. Also used the innovative 'Figure-8' coil of the XL-55 family. Very nice-sounding mono cart. A huge step up from the DL102.
    • Sony XL55Pro
    This was theoretically no different than the XL55 regular version though Sony (or their Soundtec division which designed/made the carts) made the Pro specifically to adorn the Sony PS-X9. The XL55Pro has an integrated headshell (like the XL55mono) vs the XL55 which came without headshell. With the headshell, it is quite a heavy cart - I'd estimate 25-28g. The XL55Pro was reportedly a handpicked version of the XL55 (similar to the Denon 103Pro in concept).

Comments 108

T-Bone, your system shows your experience in the audio-business, very very good. The Micro and the Dragon are really fine pieces I would never sell. This friday I will hopefully get my 3 rectangular bases for the Nak 1000 and test the SAECs, also the EA-10 on the Micro. Ja mada

thuchan

Owner
Not sure if it's reeeaaally that rare - just rare outside Japan. Helps that I'm not outside Japan :^)

The P10 and the P3 were both launched at the same time (11/78). The PL50 and PL70 were launched in 1980, with the -II versions coming out in 1981. The P10 was lots o' dollars at the time (300,000 yen in 1978) while the P3 was about 70% more. I think it was supposed to be TOTL and then one below.

The P3 has a 10kg-cm torque motor, and the P10 is 3kg. The SP-10Mk2 at the time was about halfway between them in torque (the Mk3 had yet again more torque than the P3 at 16kg-cm). The PL50 and PL70 had about 1.5kg-cm if memory serves.

The arm on the P10 (called the EA-10) is 'smaller' and appeared to have less maneuverability than the arm on the P3 (called the EA-03), though the basic functionality/structure/philosophy is the same. The P3 weighs 50% more than the P10 (which itself weighs 30kg). The P10 was also available in motor-only form (called the EM-10). The P3 and P10 were tested in the famous Stereo Sound showdown of top-end TTs done in 1980. The P3 shared top place (or more like 'top jr') with the EMT930 and the P10 came in with 7 points, like most of the other tables.

I agree the arms bear a similarity to the Max-282 (and funnily enough, effective length on the EA-03 and EA-10 arms is 282mm), both in form and in mechanical construction. They also sound somewhat similar (actually, I'm basing the comparison against my recollection of the last time I used my Max 237). The arms on the P-70L and P-50L were further downgraded versions of the P10 arms (the P-70L being a 282mm arm, the P-50L having a 250mm arm). The P-70LII, when it came out in 1981 cost half as much as the P10 from a few years earlier, and the P-50L cost half of what the P-70Lii cost.

Not sure I want to comment too much about the arm until I get more hours on the P3 this go-round. As a whole, the P3/arm/isolation base are a very smoooth-sounding system. Someone somewhere is going to complain about the carbon fiber tonearm material - that's their problem. The table has nice dynamics, super stable sound, the isolation system is very effective in my setup, which probably means that the resonances on and within the arm (and as they assist the cart) come out right. The whole setup just gets out of the way of the music.

I would love to find a TT-101 (though I don't need any more). Great find!

t_bone

T bone - I am so impressed you have the uber rare P3. How is the arm on that table? Do you know if the lower P-10 model is close or a compromised version of the P3? The arm on the P-10 and P-70 / 50 look very similar to one onthe P-3. TO me they also seem to bear a similarity to the Micr-Seiki MAX 282 as well?

These old DD drives are fun - I have a Victor TT-101 in a massive lead plinth which is a blast!

radicalsteve

Owner
Syntax, thanks. Some turned out to be quite nice tables, even if old. Though isolation helps, and I don't have enough of it.

As for the SX-8000, repairs are under way. A local expert has deemed it to be 'failing pump syndrome' so I have purchased a new aquarium pump and am waiting for it to arrive. I have already built a buffer tank, and hope to set it up later this week. The P3 was scheduled to go out this weekend for repairs but I was so busy it didn't go out. Guess it goes out next weekend. Hooked up the Denon yesterday and played it again. Nice table - great motor, but something of an 'edge' on it after playing the P3 for a while.

t_bone

Impressive TT collection. Some really interesting units. Did you repair the Seiki 8000?

syntax

hI,
You have to try 2A3 configuration or 300B for mids, and add a good SS amp for the bass, i think it well make your lisetning expirience better in oh so many ways.

Btw, When i am thinking more, you can try and use the Mighty VTL as bass amp.

I just love the look of the Eurythmie, they manage to capture the vision of horn.

bst,
Eran

zionist53

Owner
Wow, McGarick! Thanks for the thoughts. The Jadis pre is wonderful (but not in the picture), as are the horns. It is not the most accurate of systems, but I sure like the way it plays my music, and that's what is important to me. In the last 18-20 months or so, other than experimenting with different Japanese TTs over the past 18mos (and there are a few more which aren't listed) to learn how different TTs sound, I don't think a single thing has changed in the system. Eventually I'll probably winnow out most of the DD TTs but first I would like to try to compare stock vs re-plinthed in a few cases. For the moment, I'm just having fun with them.

t_bone

This is the coolest looking system I have ever seen..
I've been reading about Jadis,they must make some of THE best tube gear. Everybody praises them, I can only imagine how the horn speakers make this sound all come together.
Great system! not only great looking but I'm sure fantastic sounding.
When I grow up I want a system just like yours.
(maybe with different knobs)

mcgarick

Owner
While I think they are wonderful, I cannot help but think their looks make people think they sound better than they actually do... :^)

t_bone

As you can see from my many posts I love horns - but yours are truely something special - a work of art! I hope one day to hear thethiose speakers.

shadorne

Owner
Patpong, the advantage of living in a country where people will (or, perhaps more accurately, used to) spend all kinds of money on new and exotic equipment which is really too big for the average living room (or is both big AND loses its distributor support), is that the used market has limited price discovery, and limited appeal (it helps that they are weird-looking too I guess). Bulky speakers tend to sell for the biggest discounts, while small speakers tend to trade for quite a bit less of a discount.

t_bone

Wow... Can believe you own a pair of those Jadis...?? a real museam piece... congratulation

patpong

Owner
Thanks erickbates and radicalsteve for the comments. Work and other things have kept me pretty swamped recently, and in the past few months I have also been working on a project (house) with a second system (and what comes pretty close to a 'dedicated room' (the 'whisky room'). Perhaps I'll have to put that in the systems section too.

Radicalsteve, I always thought the Dynavector might be a decent match for the MS but I have yet to find one which was I willing to sink the money into... I am, at heart, always looking for the great used piece which is woefully undervalued, and Dynavector prices give me pause.

t_bone

T-bone, great system. I have an RX-5000 and a problematic RY-5000 power supply that has forced me to use the Verus. It has been a mixed bag until I figured that the best position was for the drive/idler wheel to be set low on the platter and then the "big" Micro sound is alive and well. I heard the presentation go from a little dark using the silk drive to a larger dynamic more impactful sound, not unlike the other idlers, but somehow smoother, a bit more refined perhaps. I did get lots of rumble from the idler when it was set higher, which originally I put down to the o-ring on the drive wheel. The massive platter does challenge the Verus drive mechanics, notwithstanding that I use a heavy Audiolife gunmetal mat to dampen the micro platter ringing.

Having said all of that, my preferred table at the moment is my Oracle Delphi with Dynavector 507 II - it just gets the timing and cadence absolutely spot on.

I might let you know ahead when my next trip to Tokyo is going to be - great city for audio gear!

Steve

radicalsteve

T-bone, love your system... especially the Jadis Eurythmie II. I think your at the top of the heap for sure :)

erickbates

It is a pity, that your Seiki 8000 is not running. Hope you can repair it. It is a interesting unit. Good luck.

thomasheisig

Owner
Hi Albert, I had, I admit, forgotten about your Walker being up for sale. In the meantime, my MS has developed a case of asthma and after breathing heavily for a while, the air bearing loses its bearing and decides to rest. I have yet to take it apart to see what exactly is the problem. I expect it will be a seal or o-ring. In the meantime, my MS is temporarily out of commission (listening to the Yamaha, which has no breathing problems).

t_bone

T_bone, I'm still waiting for the offer you made back on 12-07 for my turntable......

My Walker's now advertised here at Audiogon, awaiting the right buyer so I can grab your Micro Seiki :^)

What happened? Was it something I said? :^).

albertporter

Owner
Kbin, not done yet... :^)
Mapman, drop me a mail if you get to Tokyo...

t_bone

Auditioning a pair of those Eurythmies retains its place this week as my #1 audio fantasy.

mapman

Great system you have
let me know when you are done with that Jadis speakers
Kbin

kbinfamily

Owner
Thanks Clipper35! Very interesting! The filter (which you refer to - "comes from Switzerland") is the passive crossover box I assume...

t_bone

I think it's for the two series. I met a man who worked in the firm. He had the list of the 50 pairs and who there where sold. I found mine with the number of the filter (it comes from switzerland). Moreover, there where only 2 pairs in France. The others were all over the world. They've had a lot of success in Asia.

clipper35

Sweet!

krellm7

Owner
Clipper35, thanks for the info. I had never seen a production number. I assume that is both series 1 and series 2?

t_bone

Showing 26 - 50 of 108 posts