Beautiful system. I also have the Manley Neo-Classic 300B SE/PP amps and the Manley Neo-Classic 300B Preamp in my system. I've been contemplating changing to Tannoy Kensington GR versus Canterbury GR, and I'm not sure which would be optimal with this set-up for my listening tastes. Both the Kensington and Canterbury sound great, but many people think the Kensington has a slightly sweeter and more natural midrange. I have an average sized listening room, about 18 X 24 feet, and listen at moderate sound levels, mostly opera, classical, symphonic, and some jazz.
I suspect the Canterbury is more dynamic and has somewhat stronger and more extended bass, but that huge 15 inch low frequency driver can be harder to control with a lower powered amplifier. The Kensington may actually be a better match for the Manley 300B amps. I totally agree with your comments about use of negative feedback. Minimal levels of negative feedback can really help tighten up bass response. I generally prefer 2-3 db negative feedback with my current speakers, otherwise some bass control and definition is sacrificed.
I noticed that Tannoy changed the minimum amp requirements for the new Kensington GR in recent literature, lowered to min 20 watts per channel, and the sensitivity is a little higher (~94 db) compared to the previous SE version (~93 db). Minimum recommended amp power for the Canterbury GR remains 50 watts per channel.
Can you share any comments on the dynamic capabilities of the Kensington GR with the Manley 300B amps? I'm looking for excellent macrodynamics and microdynamics, transparency, accurate vocal reproduction, tonal purity, and superb imaging. I think the Kensington GR could be ideal. Thanks!
