Jloveys,

I know the problem

Good luck!

dgob May 17, 2009 15:04

Well done Jloveys, from my familiarity with some of its parts, I suspect this system is a lot more rewarding.

Incidentally, if you can find another pair of Quads, they take a major step forward when stacked. Bass will be only one notable improvement.

Happy listening

dgob May 15, 2009 09:25

Jloveys,

I think "bad-ass" is an American colloquilism meaning "very good"

dgob November 27, 2008 04:55

Dear Jloveys,

If you're certain! Please don't be overly careful and feel free to engage in open discussion about anything. If I have an "opinion", I will gladly share it.

My experience leads me to greater awareness only that somethings that seem better might just be different and that our differing audio perspectives lead to many interesting roads I enjoy the ride and try to keep open and learning (fidelity - high or not so - is another issue);~)

dgob October 25, 2008 08:09

Jloveys,

I like your general thinking and approach. Your system reminds me strongly of a former system that I used to use. Just curious, but have you tried removing the Symposium roller block sections and just stacking the Symposium precision couplers under your deck? I think that this could work wonders for the imaging and PRaT that you achieve.

Also, if you ever get the chance to listen to the SP25 MK2 with an EAR 324 phono stage it might impress a lot. There are slight issues with the gain levels here (meaning you cannot turn the sound down completely!) but I think this combination could add a lot at a very reasonable price.

dgob October 24, 2008 02:45